iVOD / 170840

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

王育敏 @ 第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第22次全體委員會議

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:07,500 好 謝謝主席 我們有請衛福部部長 食藥署署長
00:00:07,500 00:00:12,000 經濟部常務次長 台廠的副總 一起上台
00:00:12,000 00:00:15,500 還有行政院食安辦的徐副主任
00:00:15,500 00:00:22,000 來 我先問那個台廠的副總
00:00:22,000 00:00:24,500 你們剛拿了兩罐繼續拿上來沒有關係
00:00:25,500 00:00:33,500 來 你告訴本席脫膠原油是你台廠的製油原料嗎 是或不是
00:00:33,500 00:00:39,500 我們台廠做沙拉油是從黃豆開始
00:00:39,500 00:00:42,500 我們進口的都是美國黃豆
00:00:42,500 00:00:48,500 好 我直接問你 你跟中聯買的脫膠原油就是這一罐對不對
00:00:48,500 00:00:51,500 對 我們自己也有生產
00:00:51,500 00:00:55,500 這一罐是不是你使用有的原料 是或不是
00:00:55,500 00:01:01,500 它不能使用 它必須要經過 它必須要經過精煉
00:01:01,500 00:01:05,500 我知道 它是不是原料 當然是原料
00:01:05,500 00:01:07,500 對啊 當然是原料啊
00:01:07,500 00:01:11,500 你跟中聯買了多少 它不是食品加
00:01:11,500 00:01:14,500 你本來要跟他購買那一批是多少公噸
00:01:14,500 00:01:17,500 我們這內製的超標案是三千噸
00:01:17,500 00:01:19,500 三千噸嘛 對不對
00:01:19,500 00:01:27,500 那它5月11號我們去豐朝送驗的那個草
00:01:27,500 00:01:30,500 那個草它是一千一百多噸
00:01:30,500 00:01:33,500 都出問題嘛 超標嘛 對不對
00:01:33,500 00:01:38,500 那個草我們當初就是豐存了 我們也沒有載到
00:01:38,500 00:01:40,500 以前有沒有發生過這樣的情況
00:01:40,500 00:01:43,500 以前你們驗的有沒有發生這樣的情況
00:01:43,500 00:01:45,500 也有超標的情況 退驗的情況
00:01:45,500 00:01:47,500 以前驗都沒有這樣的狀況
00:01:47,500 00:01:49,500 都沒有超標嗎
00:01:49,500 00:01:51,500 都有符合我們的驗收標準
00:01:51,500 00:01:54,500 是多少 你們自己制定的驗收標準是要
00:01:54,500 00:01:57,500 那個本評比要幾ppb
00:01:57,500 00:01:59,500 本評比是兩ppb
00:01:59,500 00:02:02,500 都有符合在兩ppb以內嘛 對不對
00:02:02,500 00:02:06,500 那你為什麼要這樣子驗 你是依據食安法哪一條
00:02:06,500 00:02:11,500 沒有 這個是我們自己內定的一個招標的規格
00:02:11,500 00:02:13,500 所以你也可以不用驗就對了 可以
00:02:13,500 00:02:17,500 所以如果本評比超標 你們可以繼續製作就對了
00:02:17,500 00:02:21,500 我們會調整我們的製程 讓它那個本評比
00:02:21,500 00:02:24,500 那你這一批為什麼要退 如果按照你的邏輯
00:02:24,500 00:02:26,500 這個是我們招標合約裡頭
00:02:26,500 00:02:28,500 我們就已經定了規格在那裡
00:02:28,500 00:02:31,500 一定要符合我們的規格 不符合規格我們就是要退
00:02:31,500 00:02:35,500 那為什麼要定這個標準 既然你後面的技術都可以脫色脫酸
00:02:35,500 00:02:37,500 剛剛那個 待會我要問部長
00:02:37,500 00:02:39,500 那個成本會不一樣啊
00:02:39,500 00:02:41,500 成本會不一樣
00:02:41,500 00:02:45,500 所以不是因為食安法 是因為成本的關係
00:02:45,500 00:02:46,500 是 沒有錯
00:02:46,500 00:02:48,500 沒有錯 這是你的答案喔
00:02:48,500 00:02:53,500 你們針對原料的管理 是因為我不需要基本的嚴格把關
00:02:53,500 00:02:58,500 我是因為成本控制 所以我今天才去定出2ppb的
00:02:58,500 00:03:00,500 這樣的本評比的標準
00:03:00,500 00:03:06,500 就算說它本評比偏高 經過我們的精煉製程上面的調整
00:03:06,500 00:03:11,500 所以你之前到底有沒有購買過超過2ppb本評比的
00:03:11,500 00:03:15,500 是沒有啦 因為我們都定那個2ppb嘛
00:03:15,500 00:03:18,500 這樣的話對我們來講是整個製程會比較順暢
00:03:18,500 00:03:20,500 而且它成本是最低的
00:03:20,500 00:03:22,500 所以過去都沒有 沒有
00:03:22,500 00:03:26,500 然後你就定了2ppb 是 就定了國家的這個標準
00:03:26,500 00:03:28,500 那超標你也可以用
00:03:28,500 00:03:31,500 完全不涉及食安
00:03:31,500 00:03:34,500 這個聽起來非常的可怕 大家各位聽懂了嗎
00:03:34,500 00:03:38,500 就是說台糖也可以不用是2ppb喔
00:03:38,500 00:03:40,500 它不用是這樣子喔
00:03:40,500 00:03:44,500 因為對他們來講 剛剛石部長告訴大家的也是喔
00:03:44,500 00:03:46,500 就是即使它是原料
00:03:46,500 00:03:48,500 它今天超標沒有關係
00:03:48,500 00:03:51,500 其實坦白講你也可以不用退運啦 對不對
00:03:51,500 00:03:53,500 按照你的邏輯也可以不用退運啦
00:03:53,500 00:03:55,500 我繼續做 你沒有違反食安法
00:03:55,500 00:03:58,500 我們招標的時候的規格
00:03:58,500 00:04:00,500 你們太荒謬了
00:04:00,500 00:04:03,500 都不按照食安法辦事的嗎
00:04:03,500 00:04:06,500 既然脫交原有是你的原料
00:04:06,500 00:04:09,500 原料有疑慮的時候
00:04:09,500 00:04:12,500 原料有疑慮你竟然還好意思說
00:04:12,500 00:04:14,500 我的技術夠
00:04:14,500 00:04:16,500 所以我可以繼續做
00:04:16,500 00:04:18,500 剛剛石崇良部長也是這樣子講
00:04:18,500 00:04:20,500 這樣子有道理嗎
00:04:20,500 00:04:22,500 這樣子有道理嗎
00:04:22,500 00:04:24,500 食安法它規格不斷的
00:04:24,500 00:04:26,500 所以你們是說只要是出交原有
00:04:26,500 00:04:28,500 根本就不用設標準
00:04:28,500 00:04:30,500 反正只要我可以不斷的精煉
00:04:30,500 00:04:32,500 到最終的產品
00:04:32,500 00:04:34,500 只要符合2PPB就好了
00:04:34,500 00:04:37,500 那你的食安法我們都要定假的嗎
00:04:37,500 00:04:39,500 從原料就應該要開始檢驗
00:04:39,500 00:04:41,500 在你的邏輯裡面
00:04:41,500 00:04:43,500 原料不需要
00:04:43,500 00:04:45,500 只要我有本事把它精煉出
00:04:45,500 00:04:46,500 檢測不到
00:04:46,500 00:04:47,500 那是我的本事
00:04:47,500 00:04:48,500 是這樣子嗎
00:04:48,500 00:04:50,500 沒有 出油它不能
00:04:50,500 00:04:52,500 它就長這個樣子
00:04:52,500 00:04:54,500 那是你的原料不是嗎
00:04:54,500 00:04:56,500 這個是 對呀
00:04:56,500 00:04:57,500 這個就是出油
00:04:57,500 00:04:59,500 對呀 那你的原料就應該要把關
00:04:59,500 00:05:01,500 就要符合食安法的規範
00:05:01,500 00:05:03,500 原料沒有規範
00:05:03,500 00:05:05,500 食安法都沒有規範
00:05:05,500 00:05:07,500 那就是衛福部食品
00:05:07,500 00:05:09,500 食安法它的規範
00:05:09,500 00:05:11,500 它是針對食品
00:05:11,500 00:05:13,500 就是說你直接可以用的
00:05:13,500 00:05:15,500 原料都不規範的
00:05:15,500 00:05:17,500 原料已經出現
00:05:17,500 00:05:19,500 一幾次癌物都不用規範的
00:05:19,500 00:05:21,500 它不是有一律的商品嗎
00:05:21,500 00:05:23,500 沒有 你經過精煉
00:05:23,500 00:05:25,500 存化之後
00:05:25,500 00:05:27,500 它就會變成這個樣子
00:05:27,500 00:05:29,500 所以原料是可以不用管的
00:05:29,500 00:05:31,500 要管 因為它會影響成本
00:05:31,500 00:05:33,500 只是因為成本不是食安的考量
00:05:33,500 00:05:35,500 好 來台長請回去
00:05:35,500 00:05:37,500 我問一下那個
00:05:37,500 00:05:39,500 經濟部長次
00:05:39,500 00:05:41,500 請問台長的社會責任是什麼
00:05:41,500 00:05:43,500 至少門前雪
00:05:43,500 00:05:45,500 我今天發現
00:05:45,500 00:05:47,500 我的脫膠原油
00:05:47,500 00:05:49,500 這個本便品超標
00:05:49,500 00:05:51,500 超標了七倍
00:05:51,500 00:05:53,500 我只要默默的把它退回去就好
00:05:53,500 00:05:55,500 因為不符合我的採購規定
00:05:55,500 00:05:57,500 但是我完全不需要
00:05:57,500 00:05:59,500 我完全不需要通報
00:05:59,500 00:06:01,500 這個叫做至少門前雪
00:06:01,500 00:06:03,500 在經濟部的標準好低
00:06:03,500 00:06:05,500 一個至少門前雪的人
00:06:05,500 00:06:07,500 說他是模範生
00:06:07,500 00:06:09,500 請問你的社會責任在哪裡
00:06:09,500 00:06:11,500 你不覺得很異常嗎
00:06:11,500 00:06:13,500 今天你脫膠原油是第一次買
00:06:13,500 00:06:15,500 是不是 如果以前都是
00:06:15,500 00:06:17,500 符合標準 符合你的採購標準
00:06:17,500 00:06:19,500 今天突然暴增
00:06:19,500 00:06:21,500 通通都不需要反應
00:06:21,500 00:06:23,500 當作沒有發生
00:06:23,500 00:06:25,500 上千公噸
00:06:25,500 00:06:27,500 隨便
00:06:27,500 00:06:29,500 今天如果中年繼續賣出去
00:06:29,500 00:06:31,500 也隨便
00:06:31,500 00:06:33,500 不管我的事
00:06:33,500 00:06:35,500 這個叫做模範生
00:06:35,500 00:06:37,500 這個叫做社會責任
00:06:37,500 00:06:39,500 企業社會責任是這樣子寫的
00:06:39,500 00:06:41,500 作為一個經濟部次長
00:06:41,500 00:06:43,500 你們說這個叫模範生
00:06:43,500 00:06:45,500 你的標準真的好低
00:06:45,500 00:06:47,500 還不如一個吹哨者
00:06:47,500 00:06:49,500 跟委員會說明
00:06:49,500 00:06:51,500 台長公司所生產的產品
00:06:51,500 00:06:53,500 它有自己的標準
00:06:53,500 00:06:55,500 標標本篇皮的
00:06:55,500 00:06:57,500 要不要通報
00:06:57,500 00:06:59,500 它有驗收的規定
00:06:59,500 00:07:01,500 契約的規定
00:07:01,500 00:07:03,500 比如說在生產大多沙拉油
00:07:03,500 00:07:05,500 的原料的部分
00:07:05,500 00:07:07,500 其實它檢驗的項目起碼就有
00:07:07,500 00:07:09,500 10項以上
00:07:09,500 00:07:11,500 很好啊 我們正常很嚴謹
00:07:11,500 00:07:13,500 但你發現這一批膠油
00:07:13,500 00:07:15,500 超標這麼多的時候
00:07:15,500 00:07:17,500 你怎麼不用一個很嚴謹的態度來看待
00:07:17,500 00:07:19,500 為什麼不通報
00:07:19,500 00:07:21,500 第一時間台長有沒有跟你講
00:07:21,500 00:07:23,500 這個依照台中地方法院的新聞稿
00:07:23,500 00:07:25,500 也是有提到
00:07:25,500 00:07:27,500 包括中聯跟福茂
00:07:27,500 00:07:29,500 它必須要依照食安法去進行通報
00:07:29,500 00:07:31,500 他們有他們的責任 我現在問的是你主管的國營機構台長
00:07:31,500 00:07:33,500 他發現這麼重大
00:07:33,500 00:07:35,500 是不是需要跟你主管機構報告
00:07:35,500 00:07:37,500 你什麼時候知道的
00:07:37,500 00:07:39,500 你什麼時候知道的
00:07:39,500 00:07:41,500 你什麼時候知道的
00:07:41,500 00:07:43,500 從來沒有進入到台糖生產的產線
00:07:43,500 00:07:45,500 所以你還在辯解
00:07:45,500 00:07:47,500 7月9號的時候
00:07:47,500 00:07:49,500 台糖公司
00:07:49,500 00:07:51,500 你7月9號才知道
00:07:51,500 00:07:53,500 後知後覺
00:07:53,500 00:07:55,500 麻煩委員讓我時間說明
00:07:55,500 00:07:57,500 7月9號台糖收到高雄市政府
00:07:57,500 00:07:59,500 預防性下架一個通知
00:07:59,500 00:08:01,500 他有通報
00:08:01,500 00:08:03,500 所以你是7月9號知道的
00:08:03,500 00:08:05,500 我們國營是因為平常的
00:08:05,500 00:08:07,500 台糖公司的正常的採購的事項
00:08:07,500 00:08:09,500 包括國營機構
00:08:09,500 00:08:11,500 非常多的採購
00:08:11,500 00:08:13,500 你是7月9號知道的
00:08:13,500 00:08:15,500 他不會跟我們說明
00:08:15,500 00:08:17,500 市長我再問你
00:08:17,500 00:08:19,500 市長你覺得台糖公司
00:08:19,500 00:08:21,500 下一次他在發現這種原料
00:08:21,500 00:08:23,500 超標含有毒物質
00:08:23,500 00:08:25,500 你認為他需不需要通報
00:08:25,500 00:08:27,500 這個就是我們今天本來
00:08:27,500 00:08:29,500 議程要討論的食安法
00:08:29,500 00:08:31,500 需要去經濟農業
00:08:31,500 00:08:33,500 台糖公司依照法規去辦理
00:08:33,500 00:08:35,500 我想知道你的標準
00:08:35,500 00:08:37,500 下一次台糖發現的時候
00:08:37,500 00:08:39,500 類似這樣的情況需不需要通報
00:08:39,500 00:08:41,500 你告訴我就好
00:08:41,500 00:08:43,500 台糖公司依照法規來辦理
00:08:43,500 00:08:45,500 你覺得需不需要
00:08:45,500 00:08:47,500 市長你信不信
00:08:47,500 00:08:49,500 你根本都不敢回答這個問題
00:08:49,500 00:08:51,500 那個我只能說
00:08:51,500 00:08:53,500 非常的遺憾
00:08:53,500 00:08:55,500 這個社會有良心的人越來越少
00:08:55,500 00:08:57,500 我們很佩服陳宏達主任
00:08:57,500 00:08:59,500 檢察官還有詹長犬教授
00:08:59,500 00:09:01,500 他們是社會的良心
00:09:01,500 00:09:03,500 他們講該講的話不像現在的
00:09:03,500 00:09:05,500 官員只想護航
00:09:05,500 00:09:07,500 然後不講真話
00:09:07,500 00:09:09,500 食安法這個徐福主任
00:09:09,500 00:09:11,500 你也站過來食安法當你在
00:09:11,500 00:09:13,500 修法的時候你應該站你當時是專家學者
00:09:13,500 00:09:15,500 上一波的食安法
00:09:15,500 00:09:17,500 修法的精神
00:09:17,500 00:09:19,500 我跟大家講
00:09:19,500 00:09:21,500 他很明確告訴大家食品
00:09:21,500 00:09:23,500 包含原料
00:09:23,500 00:09:25,500 跟產品
00:09:25,500 00:09:27,500 而且他又告訴大家
00:09:27,500 00:09:29,500 這個產品
00:09:29,500 00:09:31,500 涉及到的原材料
00:09:31,500 00:09:33,500 原料半成品
00:09:33,500 00:09:35,500 成品
00:09:35,500 00:09:37,500 他都要業者做什麼
00:09:37,500 00:09:39,500 自主的檢驗把關
00:09:39,500 00:09:41,500 所以
00:09:41,500 00:09:43,500 你當時2014年所修的食安法
00:09:43,500 00:09:45,500 他的
00:09:45,500 00:09:47,500 修法的精神就是詹長犬教授
00:09:47,500 00:09:49,500 所講的
00:09:49,500 00:09:51,500 他是建立在預警
00:09:51,500 00:09:53,500 跟可控的這樣一個精神裡面
00:09:53,500 00:09:59,500 如果你今天是站在一個預警的角度
00:09:59,500 00:10:01,500 管控食安
00:10:01,500 00:10:03,500 從源頭把關
00:10:03,500 00:10:05,500 今天台糖發現
00:10:05,500 00:10:07,500 這樣的一個
00:10:07,500 00:10:09,500 原油脫膠原油
00:10:09,500 00:10:11,500 本便宜嚴重
00:10:11,500 00:10:13,500 超標的時候
00:10:13,500 00:10:15,500 作為一個國營
00:10:15,500 00:10:17,500 企業
00:10:17,500 00:10:19,500 善盡社會責任
00:10:19,500 00:10:21,500 就應該要通報
00:10:21,500 00:10:23,500 主管機關
00:10:23,500 00:10:25,500 這樣的一個做法
00:10:25,500 00:10:27,500 才符合所有食安法
00:10:27,500 00:10:29,500 你從第一條看到最後一條
00:10:29,500 00:10:31,500 他在要求的
00:10:31,500 00:10:33,500 都是從源頭的原料
00:10:33,500 00:10:35,500 管道成品
00:10:35,500 00:10:37,500 絕對不是你們現在的推托
00:10:37,500 00:10:39,500 推托之詞
00:10:39,500 00:10:41,500 什麼這個脫膠原油
00:10:41,500 00:10:43,500 不是食品
00:10:43,500 00:10:45,500 所以都不在食安法的管制範圍嗎
00:10:45,500 00:10:47,500 這樣的說法
00:10:47,500 00:10:49,500 荒謬無比
00:10:49,500 00:10:51,500 而且完全違反
00:10:51,500 00:10:53,500 食安法的精神
00:10:53,500 00:10:55,500 這個也是我相信詹長犬教授
00:10:55,500 00:10:57,500 為什麼他痛批
00:10:57,500 00:10:59,500 他說這已經是政府
00:10:59,500 00:11:01,500 誠信跟治理的問題
00:11:01,500 00:11:03,500 法律
00:11:03,500 00:11:05,500 你要從嚴或從寬解釋
00:11:05,500 00:11:07,500 的確政府你把握了公權力
00:11:07,500 00:11:09,500 你有權去解釋
00:11:09,500 00:11:11,500 但是我只能說
00:11:11,500 00:11:13,500 你要憑良心啊
00:11:13,500 00:11:15,500 食安法的精神是給你們
00:11:15,500 00:11:17,500 這樣子濫用的嗎
00:11:17,500 00:11:19,500 更何況我們再來看一下
00:11:19,500 00:11:21,500 這個衛福部
00:11:21,500 00:11:23,500 不要自己講過的事情
00:11:23,500 00:11:25,500 立刻講過就忘記
00:11:25,500 00:11:27,500 你在2014年
00:11:27,500 00:11:29,500 3月11號
00:11:29,500 00:11:31,500 那時候的整個
00:11:31,500 00:11:33,500 食藥署很正常
00:11:33,500 00:11:35,500 而且勇於認識
00:11:35,500 00:11:37,500 而且積極開會
00:11:37,500 00:11:39,500 從這個蘇丹紅
00:11:39,500 00:11:41,500 事件願意認真
00:11:41,500 00:11:43,500 去檢討而且告訴
00:11:43,500 00:11:45,500 大家就是
00:11:45,500 00:11:47,500 原料出問題
00:11:47,500 00:11:49,500 也都需要通報
00:11:49,500 00:11:51,500 因為我們拒絕
00:11:51,500 00:11:53,500 源頭不法講的非常
00:11:53,500 00:11:55,500 好這一篇新聞稿
00:11:55,500 00:11:57,500 我給100分
00:11:57,500 00:11:59,500 非常好認真做
00:11:59,500 00:12:01,500 事而且他提醒大家
00:12:01,500 00:12:03,500 食品業者
00:12:03,500 00:12:05,500 如果你發現原料
00:12:05,500 00:12:07,500 或產品
00:12:07,500 00:12:09,500 有危害衛生
00:12:09,500 00:12:11,500 安全之餘
00:12:11,500 00:12:13,500 要主動通報
00:12:13,500 00:12:15,500 直轄市縣市
00:12:15,500 00:12:17,500 主管機關
00:12:17,500 00:12:19,500 這個是2024
00:12:19,500 00:12:21,500 白紙黑字
00:12:21,500 00:12:23,500 由食藥署
00:12:23,500 00:12:25,500 發出的新聞稿
00:12:25,500 00:12:27,500 他的
00:12:27,500 00:12:29,500 校期只有兩年嗎
00:12:29,500 00:12:31,500 遇到了台廠
00:12:31,500 00:12:33,500 就會轉彎嗎
00:12:33,500 00:12:35,500 你當時這樣的
00:12:35,500 00:12:37,500 一個宣示難道
00:12:37,500 00:12:39,500 你沒有通通去告訴
00:12:39,500 00:12:41,500 所有的業者嗎
00:12:41,500 00:12:43,500 原料有問題需不需要
00:12:43,500 00:12:45,500 通報還是要通報
00:12:45,500 00:12:47,500 結果為了
00:12:47,500 00:12:49,500 替台廠開脫你現在
00:12:49,500 00:12:51,500 所有的法律重新
00:12:51,500 00:12:53,500 解釋你又倒退
00:12:53,500 00:12:55,500 回來了
00:12:55,500 00:12:57,500 2024年這件事情
00:12:57,500 00:12:59,500 我們絕對是支持
00:12:59,500 00:13:01,500 源頭就要管理這個沒有問題
00:13:01,500 00:13:03,500 你等我講完我沒有聽你發言
00:13:03,500 00:13:05,500 這件事情
00:13:05,500 00:13:07,500 真的
00:13:07,500 00:13:09,500 讓人家對於現在的
00:13:09,500 00:13:11,500 衛福部非常的
00:13:11,500 00:13:13,500 失望我要請行政院
00:13:13,500 00:13:15,500 食安辦的徐福主任你現在
00:13:15,500 00:13:17,500 站出來你作為衛福部
00:13:17,500 00:13:19,500 上級的主管機關
00:13:19,500 00:13:21,500 那個來
00:13:21,500 00:13:23,500 徐福主任你講
00:13:23,500 00:13:25,500 2014年
00:13:25,500 00:13:27,500 這個食安法的精神
00:13:27,500 00:13:29,500 是不是我們要預警
00:13:29,500 00:13:31,500 我們要做風險管理我們要從
00:13:31,500 00:13:33,500 源頭管理是或不是原則上
00:13:33,500 00:13:35,500 是這樣但是他的
00:13:35,500 00:13:37,500 樣態不一樣我剛聽
00:13:37,500 00:13:39,500 委員的這個說明
00:13:39,500 00:13:41,500 事實上從
00:13:41,500 00:13:43,500 原料來看他有分類假設
00:13:43,500 00:13:45,500 一個
00:13:45,500 00:13:47,500 微生物的含量過高
00:13:47,500 00:13:49,500 那就是要透過
00:13:49,500 00:13:51,500 不是所有的原料都需要通報
00:13:51,500 00:13:53,500 2024年食藥署的
00:13:53,500 00:13:55,500 這個公開的宣導跟新聞稿
00:13:55,500 00:13:57,500 蘇丹紅那是不得在
00:13:57,500 00:13:59,500 食品裡面去檢出他不是
00:13:59,500 00:14:01,500 一個新聞稿的範圍有效範圍
00:14:01,500 00:14:03,500 僅限於蘇丹紅嗎
00:14:03,500 00:14:05,500 你的原料是這個蘇丹
00:14:05,500 00:14:07,500 紅這三個字
00:14:07,500 00:14:09,500 不應添加的都應該要這樣
00:14:09,500 00:14:11,500 他有說不應添加嗎
00:14:11,500 00:14:13,500 你有認真看待
00:14:13,500 00:14:15,500 10
00:14:15,500 00:14:17,500 大家看一下我們
00:14:17,500 00:14:19,500 我們的法令
00:14:19,500 00:14:21,500 第15條第一項第三
00:14:21,500 00:14:23,500 是誰告訴你
00:14:23,500 00:14:25,500 是誰告訴你
00:14:25,500 00:14:27,500 要添加的才算
00:14:27,500 00:14:29,500 不是這樣講詹老師講的是
00:14:29,500 00:14:31,500 有道理但是要看樣態
00:14:31,500 00:14:33,500 你所有的生的東西
00:14:33,500 00:14:35,500 菌的數量一定
00:14:35,500 00:14:37,500 是比較多那當然是從
00:14:37,500 00:14:39,500 預警你要先殺完菌才能
00:14:39,500 00:14:41,500 再來用那你
00:14:41,500 00:14:43,500 做成調理包的變成
00:14:43,500 00:14:45,500 下游拿來用的時候他就不應該
00:14:45,500 00:14:47,500 草標所以他的這個
00:14:47,500 00:14:49,500 這樣態是會不一樣的
00:14:49,500 00:14:51,500 好那我就問你所以
00:14:51,500 00:14:53,500 脫交原有的本偏僻有多少
00:14:53,500 00:14:55,500 才合理含有多少才合理
00:14:55,500 00:14:57,500 這個全世界並沒有針對這個去
00:14:57,500 00:14:59,500 訂這個標準的
00:14:59,500 00:15:01,500 所以我們我們是在看
00:15:01,500 00:15:03,500 成品油那你的預警
00:15:03,500 00:15:05,500 機制到底怎麼做當你下游
00:15:05,500 00:15:07,500 當中年生產出來的
00:15:07,500 00:15:09,500 脫交原有本偏僻超標這麼多
00:15:09,500 00:15:11,500 你還說因為我們
00:15:11,500 00:15:13,500 沒有訂標準我不能採取任何
00:15:13,500 00:15:15,500 作為那你怎麼樣去預警
00:15:15,500 00:15:17,500 檢查出來有意義嗎
00:15:17,500 00:15:19,500 你好比說
00:15:19,500 00:15:21,500 放白土活性炭等等
00:15:21,500 00:15:23,500 下降到這個
00:15:23,500 00:15:25,500 這個合格值之下
00:15:25,500 00:15:27,500 你覺得這樣合理嗎
00:15:27,500 00:15:29,500 你覺得台糖
00:15:29,500 00:15:31,500 都不敢用了那這一波有
00:15:31,500 00:15:33,500 疑慮了然後這個
00:15:33,500 00:15:35,500 都不需要處理也不需要通報你們
00:15:35,500 00:15:37,500 現在還覺得這樣很合理
00:15:37,500 00:15:39,500 那你們如果要這樣子管理食安的話
00:15:39,500 00:15:41,500 最大的破口就是
00:15:41,500 00:15:43,500 行政院跟衛福部
00:15:43,500 00:15:45,500 你們從源頭去放鬆
00:15:45,500 00:15:47,500 我就舉台糖為例
00:15:47,500 00:15:49,500 沒有放鬆那我就問你
00:15:49,500 00:15:51,500 台糖這一批的脫交原有
00:15:51,500 00:15:53,500 為什麼需要退運
00:15:53,500 00:15:55,500 為什麼不能
00:15:55,500 00:15:57,500 再生產製造為什麼你們要
00:15:57,500 00:15:59,500 告訴大家他繼續在中年的油炒
00:15:59,500 00:16:01,500 按照你們剛剛回答的邏輯
00:16:01,500 00:16:03,500 你知道犯了多大的問題嗎
00:16:03,500 00:16:05,500 只要可以脫色脫臭
00:16:05,500 00:16:07,500 最終成品驗不出
00:16:07,500 00:16:09,500 本偏僻就好
00:16:09,500 00:16:11,500 我管你原料有多糟糕
00:16:11,500 00:16:13,500 我的技術可以精煉到這樣
00:16:13,500 00:16:15,500 就好了是這樣嗎
00:16:15,500 00:16:17,500 我們要管理確保
00:16:17,500 00:16:19,500 食安是就我們自己買的東西
00:16:19,500 00:16:21,500 所以大家從原料管理啊
00:16:21,500 00:16:23,500 怎麼會說原料不需要管理呢
00:16:23,500 00:16:25,500 這一批原料自始至終都在中年裡面
00:16:25,500 00:16:27,500 他不是台糖的
00:16:27,500 00:16:29,500 物品啊所以台糖
00:16:29,500 00:16:31,500 派人去中年看去送
00:16:31,500 00:16:33,500 驗回來知道說這一批沒
00:16:33,500 00:16:35,500 合格的可能收我提醒你
00:16:35,500 00:16:37,500 這件事情是這樣子你現在是食安辦
00:16:37,500 00:16:39,500 的主任你不是
00:16:39,500 00:16:41,500 台糖的發言人
00:16:41,500 00:16:43,500 作為一個食安辦的主任
00:16:43,500 00:16:45,500 我真的希望你有
00:16:45,500 00:16:47,500 詹長權教授這樣的勇氣跟
00:16:47,500 00:16:49,500 骨氣
00:16:49,500 00:16:51,500 這樣才能做好食安的把關
00:16:51,500 00:16:53,500 而不是遇到
00:16:53,500 00:16:55,500 事情的時候你們都變成是
00:16:55,500 00:16:57,500 護航團沒有必要
00:16:57,500 00:16:59,500 我今天沒有說台糖
00:16:59,500 00:17:01,500 有非常非常的不對
00:17:01,500 00:17:03,500 但我認為他做錯一件事情
00:17:03,500 00:17:05,500 是你至少門前
00:17:05,500 00:17:07,500 學你今天發現這麼重大的
00:17:07,500 00:17:09,500 瑕疵你為什麼
00:17:09,500 00:17:11,500 跟主管機關講一聲會怎樣嗎
00:17:11,500 00:17:13,500 你不是阻止了一場
00:17:13,500 00:17:15,500 這個重大食安事件的發生嗎
00:17:15,500 00:17:17,500 結果你們現在不是全部
00:17:17,500 00:17:19,500 毛起來要告訴大家說
00:17:19,500 00:17:21,500 台糖沒有錯台糖好棒棒
00:17:21,500 00:17:23,500 是棒在哪裡啦
00:17:25,500 00:17:27,500 他至少門前學他沒有
00:17:27,500 00:17:29,500 發揮他該有的社會責任他
00:17:29,500 00:17:31,500 連一個吹哨者都不如
00:17:31,500 00:17:33,500 在這一點上面不應該
00:17:33,500 00:17:35,500 被檢討嗎我就問
00:17:35,500 00:17:37,500 你下次有類似這樣的狀況
00:17:37,500 00:17:39,500 你認為他應不該通報
00:17:41,500 00:17:43,500 要或不要你作為一個食安辦主任
00:17:43,500 00:17:45,500 你趕快講真話要不要通報
00:17:47,500 00:17:49,500 要看樣態依法規
00:17:49,500 00:17:51,500 來去
00:17:51,500 00:17:53,500 我就直接問你下次如果這個
00:17:53,500 00:17:55,500 你們這個脫交原油
00:17:55,500 00:17:57,500 出現本田體超標像這樣子七倍
00:17:57,500 00:17:59,500 需不需要通報
00:18:01,500 00:18:03,500 需不需要通報
00:18:03,500 00:18:05,500 台糖有沒有通報的責任跟義務
00:18:05,500 00:18:07,500 這是他的原料喔
00:18:07,500 00:18:09,500 應該不是台糖原料是中聯原料
00:18:09,500 00:18:11,500 他那個在他的草裡面
00:18:11,500 00:18:13,500 我要說明的是這樣然後
00:18:13,500 00:18:15,500 還要看樣態的
00:18:15,500 00:18:17,500 我真的不用問你們太令人失望了
00:18:19,500 00:18:21,500 如果我們的食安要
00:18:21,500 00:18:23,500 把關一定是源頭把關
00:18:23,500 00:18:25,500 一定是按照你們原來
00:18:25,500 00:18:27,500 的這份新聞稿講的
00:18:27,500 00:18:29,500 原料半成品
00:18:29,500 00:18:31,500 還有成品你發現
00:18:31,500 00:18:33,500 有問題的時候
00:18:33,500 00:18:35,500 應該要主動通報
00:18:35,500 00:18:37,500 你這個才能發揮
00:18:37,500 00:18:39,500 層層把關的這樣子
00:18:39,500 00:18:41,500 互相去監督
00:18:41,500 00:18:43,500 互相去通報你
00:18:43,500 00:18:45,500 才能為食安把關但是我
00:18:45,500 00:18:47,500 真的非常的痛心今天
00:18:47,500 00:18:49,500 我們的公部門不站在
00:18:49,500 00:18:51,500 捍衛人民食安最
00:18:51,500 00:18:53,500 高標準我要講的是
00:18:53,500 00:18:55,500 最高標準來
00:18:55,500 00:18:57,500 執法然後
00:18:57,500 00:18:59,500 講一些是是而非
00:18:59,500 00:19:01,500 的道理然後再硬拗
00:19:01,500 00:19:03,500 這樣子我們的食安怎麼從
00:19:03,500 00:19:05,500 源頭把關這個
00:19:05,500 00:19:07,500 真的是讓人家看了非常非常的
00:19:07,500 00:19:09,500 失望真理不敢
00:19:09,500 00:19:11,500 講我真的覺得你們
00:19:11,500 00:19:13,500 的位置通通都可以下來了我們希望
00:19:13,500 00:19:15,500 詹長璇教授可以來
00:19:15,500 00:19:17,500 主導我們的
00:19:17,500 00:19:19,500 食安我們現在食安需要
00:19:19,500 00:19:21,500 長理的人
00:19:21,500 00:19:23,500 需要有一個有道德勇氣
00:19:23,500 00:19:25,500 在食安把關上面
00:19:25,500 00:19:27,500 他真的是站在人民
00:19:27,500 00:19:29,500 這一邊的我們需要這樣的一個專家
00:19:29,500 00:19:31,500 來帶領我們的食安
00:19:31,500 00:19:33,500 如果只是為了位置而存在
00:19:33,500 00:19:35,500 的話我真的覺得我們
00:19:35,500 00:19:37,500 台灣真的不需要好我質詢到
00:19:37,500 00:19:39,500 這邊給你最後說明一句
00:19:39,500 00:19:41,500 我們的調查報告寫得很
00:19:41,500 00:19:43,500 清楚必須按照原料
00:19:43,500 00:19:45,500 的品質做製程調整
00:19:45,500 00:19:47,500 所以需要監督
00:19:47,500 00:19:49,500 的是地方政府要去監督
00:19:49,500 00:19:51,500 好他的製程過程
00:19:51,500 00:19:53,500 是不是符合HACCP
00:19:53,500 00:19:55,500 的標準
00:19:55,500 00:19:57,500 謝謝