iVOD / 170690

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

吳宗憲 @ 第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第26次全體委員會議

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:07,000 好 謝謝主席 我們麻煩衛福部長
00:00:07,000 00:00:09,000 麻煩部長
00:00:09,000 00:00:17,000 好 部長我先跟您提到
00:00:17,000 00:00:21,000 就是2014以前的那個2014那個問題
00:00:21,000 00:00:24,000 其實2014頂新的那個案子
00:00:24,000 00:00:27,000 其實我們當時從案子我們學到一個概念
00:00:27,000 00:00:29,000 就是說他一審都判無罪
00:00:29,000 00:00:33,000 所以當時其實輿論還一直罵檢方說
00:00:33,000 00:00:36,000 你們胡亂起訴 你們濫行起訴
00:00:36,000 00:00:41,000 還好是後來檢方他有再去找到新的證據來補強
00:00:41,000 00:00:45,000 補強說他有購入的那個原料的油
00:00:45,000 00:00:48,000 他的酸價過高還有重金屬含量不符標準
00:00:48,000 00:00:52,000 否則這個案子當時就會一路無罪到確定了
00:00:52,000 00:00:56,000 也就是說今天如果說我們相關的市政
00:00:56,000 00:00:58,000 如果沒有辦法準備齊全
00:00:58,000 00:01:00,000 或者是那個我們扣留的證據
00:01:00,000 00:01:02,000 沒有辦法有證據能力的話
00:01:02,000 00:01:04,000 以後會完全影響到整個案子
00:01:04,000 00:01:07,000 變成說你到時候大家都把壞的油吃到肚子裡
00:01:07,000 00:01:08,000 但是業者都會判無罪
00:01:08,000 00:01:10,000 所以今天這個教訓是什麼
00:01:10,000 00:01:12,000 就是食安犯罪的成敗
00:01:12,000 00:01:15,000 不是法庭上面就決定了
00:01:15,000 00:01:18,000 而是第一個時間你有沒有證據保全
00:01:18,000 00:01:20,000 你的稽查的紀錄有沒有留存
00:01:20,000 00:01:21,000 這個是重點
00:01:21,000 00:01:26,000 那今天我們發生了這個中聯的自來油的案件
00:01:26,000 00:01:27,000 我就會擔心這個部分
00:01:27,000 00:01:30,000 所以我今天才會跟衛福部請你來
00:01:30,000 00:01:32,000 當然法務部今天有來
00:01:32,000 00:01:34,000 那法務部這邊我可能知道就好
00:01:34,000 00:01:37,000 我現在主要還是跟衛福部來做溝通
00:01:37,000 00:01:39,000 因為你們這一次的書面報告寫得很漂亮
00:01:39,000 00:01:41,000 說要公開透明
00:01:41,000 00:01:42,000 及時風險溝通
00:01:42,000 00:01:44,000 逐批查驗
00:01:44,000 00:01:48,000 但是這個東西這三個問題
00:01:48,000 00:01:52,000 全部都跟到底有沒有留下證據有關係
00:01:52,000 00:01:54,000 也就是說有沒有留下紀錄
00:01:54,000 00:01:55,000 有沒有留下證據
00:01:55,000 00:01:58,000 事後人有沒有辦法篡改
00:01:58,000 00:02:00,000 有沒有辦法讓他們賴都賴不掉
00:02:00,000 00:02:03,000 這個才是行政機關要做到的
00:02:03,000 00:02:07,000 因為這些資料都是將來我們要給法庭的證據
00:02:07,000 00:02:11,000 所以到底我們今天的流樣制度會不會形同虛設
00:02:11,000 00:02:13,000 因為你自己的報告也有提到
00:02:13,000 00:02:16,000 7月21號食藥署風險
00:02:16,000 00:02:22,000 那個知義會處理的批次裡面有一批沒有檢體
00:02:22,000 00:02:25,000 也就是說你今天樣本都留不住了
00:02:25,000 00:02:26,000 對不對
00:02:26,000 00:02:27,000 這就一個很大的問題嘛
00:02:27,000 00:02:30,000 等於我們流樣制度有一個好大的缺口
00:02:30,000 00:02:32,000 竟然有東西我們連樣本都沒有
00:02:32,000 00:02:33,000 證據都沒有
00:02:33,000 00:02:37,000 有這種東西就算底下釋出很大的問題
00:02:37,000 00:02:39,000 到法庭法官也判不下去
00:02:39,000 00:02:42,000 所以您之前措訪的時候有說
00:02:42,000 00:02:43,000 29批樣本
00:02:43,000 00:02:46,000 送第三方實驗室有驗出來幾乎合格
00:02:46,000 00:02:51,000 但是下游廠商的產品卻驗出本便比超標
00:02:51,000 00:02:53,000 對不對 這個沒錯吧
00:02:53,000 00:02:56,000 我簡單的跟委員說明
00:02:56,000 00:02:59,000 確實這個證據的保全是非常重要
00:02:59,000 00:03:01,000 您指示的方向是
00:03:01,000 00:03:03,000 我們完全是按照這樣做
00:03:03,000 00:03:07,000 在中聯油廠裡面它需要有樣本
00:03:07,000 00:03:11,000 所以它30個批次的樣本都有
00:03:11,000 00:03:14,000 只是檢驗出來的結果都符合
00:03:14,000 00:03:19,000 但是下游的產品檢出有超標
00:03:19,000 00:03:21,000 所以表示這個樣本有問題
00:03:21,000 00:03:25,000 所以剛才你提到有一個沒有檢體
00:03:25,000 00:03:26,000 指的是第二層
00:03:26,000 00:03:29,000 所以你是不是有說不排除檢體召
00:03:29,000 00:03:31,000 調換或造假
00:03:31,000 00:03:33,000 你有對外這樣講對不對
00:03:33,000 00:03:35,000 部長這個代表什麼
00:03:35,000 00:03:37,000 就代表你們在管理的機制裡面
00:03:37,000 00:03:40,000 業者自己留樣自己送驗
00:03:40,000 00:03:42,000 行政機關沒有獨立的留樣
00:03:42,000 00:03:44,000 沒有平行的採樣
00:03:44,000 00:03:47,000 也就是說你沒有留下一份證據
00:03:47,000 00:03:49,000 你沒有自己留一份
00:03:49,000 00:03:50,000 你也沒有自己採一份
00:03:50,000 00:03:52,000 那這樣子的制度變成是
00:03:52,000 00:03:53,000 業者你自己驗
00:03:53,000 00:03:54,000 自己留自己驗
00:03:54,000 00:03:55,000 驗完數據給我
00:03:55,000 00:03:58,000 那我變成只有幫你背書的份而已
00:03:58,000 00:04:00,000 我完全沒有積合
00:04:00,000 00:04:01,000 我也沒有留任何東西
00:04:01,000 00:04:03,000 這就是我目前覺得
00:04:03,000 00:04:06,000 那等於有管跟沒有管一樣
00:04:06,000 00:04:09,000 那我要再跟部長說一下
00:04:09,000 00:04:11,000 我們立法院的預算中心有說到
00:04:11,000 00:04:15,000 時安預算從109年的56.34億
00:04:15,000 00:04:18,000 成長到113年的106.95億
00:04:18,000 00:04:20,000 漲幅快九成
00:04:20,000 00:04:24,000 那後來我們的卓榮泰院長也說了
00:04:24,000 00:04:30,000 114年時安整體的預算編列到109.8億
00:04:30,000 00:04:32,000 然後後來又說
00:04:32,000 00:04:35,000 多了一個時安新計畫
00:04:35,000 00:04:36,000 多了18.5億
00:04:36,000 00:04:38,000 我想這個部長一定非常熟
00:04:38,000 00:04:39,000 我就不再多論述
00:04:39,000 00:04:41,000 也就是說我們這幾年
00:04:41,000 00:04:43,000 已經花了好幾百億
00:04:43,000 00:04:44,000 在時安上面
00:04:44,000 00:04:46,000 但是我們現在連家庭的油都出問題
00:04:46,000 00:04:47,000 這個是我覺得
00:04:47,000 00:04:49,000 我們國家花那麼多錢
00:04:49,000 00:04:51,000 但是我們得不到好的效果
00:04:51,000 00:04:54,000 我想這個也是民眾心裡打的一個問號
00:04:54,000 00:04:56,000 那所以現在的問題
00:04:56,000 00:04:58,000 在這一次中聯油案爆發之前
00:04:58,000 00:05:00,000 這些廠商的留痕
00:05:00,000 00:05:03,000 留下證據留痕的這個機制
00:05:03,000 00:05:05,000 完全都不存在嗎
00:05:05,000 00:05:06,000 跟委員說明
00:05:06,000 00:05:10,000 所以在時安的三級評管當中
00:05:10,000 00:05:11,000 還有第三級
00:05:11,000 00:05:13,000 第三級就是地方衛生局
00:05:13,000 00:05:15,000 叫進行實地的查場
00:05:15,000 00:05:17,000 也具有抽樣
00:05:17,000 00:05:20,000 所以除了他自己的樣本要保留
00:05:20,000 00:05:22,000 依法要保留之外
00:05:22,000 00:05:25,000 那麼地方主管機關在稽查的時候
00:05:25,000 00:05:26,000 也可以抽樣
00:05:26,000 00:05:30,000 所以有幾個衛生局他的抽樣很頻繁
00:05:30,000 00:05:32,000 也是應於這樣的法律授權去執行
00:05:32,000 00:05:34,000 他們抽樣是對於
00:05:34,000 00:05:36,000 廠商留存的樣本抽樣
00:05:36,000 00:05:39,000 還是直接到地點去抽樣
00:05:39,000 00:05:40,000 對直接抽樣
00:05:40,000 00:05:41,000 因為你們這一次
00:05:41,000 00:05:43,000 我要先講一件事情就是說
00:05:43,000 00:05:47,000 因為你們這一次有提到的所謂的
00:05:47,000 00:05:50,000 什麼修法十大方向等等
00:05:50,000 00:05:51,000 但我要跟你們講
00:05:51,000 00:05:53,000 其實我們一直到現在
00:05:53,000 00:05:54,000 我們不是沒有法律
00:05:54,000 00:05:56,000 你們一直說要修法
00:05:56,000 00:05:57,000 因為我到立法院來
00:05:57,000 00:05:58,000 我才有一個感覺
00:05:58,000 00:06:01,000 行政機關每次事情沒有做好
00:06:01,000 00:06:02,000 他就說我們要修法
00:06:02,000 00:06:05,000 但是很多時候法律早就有了
00:06:05,000 00:06:07,000 行政機關推責任的另外一個推法
00:06:07,000 00:06:08,000 就是推給立法院
00:06:08,000 00:06:11,000 我跟你說像我們十三法第七條
00:06:11,000 00:06:14,000 就有要求業者發現有危害之虞
00:06:14,000 00:06:15,000 就要急通報
00:06:15,000 00:06:18,000 第九條他有要求有職業者
00:06:18,000 00:06:21,000 建立追溯追蹤系統電子申報流向
00:06:21,000 00:06:22,000 對不對
00:06:22,000 00:06:24,000 那中聯他就是這個第九條的
00:06:24,000 00:06:27,000 這個使用有有職的業者
00:06:27,000 00:06:30,000 所以很多時候我們目前行政機關
00:06:30,000 00:06:33,000 行政的作為不是沒有法律依據
00:06:33,000 00:06:36,000 而是業者他會繞過法律依據
00:06:36,000 00:06:38,000 去騙你們對不對
00:06:38,000 00:06:39,000 我沒有說你們錯
00:06:39,000 00:06:40,000 他會騙你們
00:06:40,000 00:06:42,000 所以不是沒有法律
00:06:42,000 00:06:45,000 而是執行上面有漏洞讓他們鑽
00:06:45,000 00:06:47,000 所以這個不是修法的問題
00:06:47,000 00:06:50,000 常常是行政機關行政的問題
00:06:50,000 00:06:52,000 我這邊先跟部長說
00:06:52,000 00:06:54,000 我是不是可以跟委員說明
00:06:54,000 00:06:57,000 因為這個通報你這邊寫的很對
00:06:57,000 00:07:01,000 他這個一直隱匿而且延遲通報
00:07:01,000 00:07:03,000 所以一方面我們要把通報的
00:07:03,000 00:07:05,000 延遲的代價提高
00:07:05,000 00:07:07,000 所以他的罰款要增加
00:07:07,000 00:07:12,000 之外也要賦予檢驗的單位的通報
00:07:12,000 00:07:15,000 因為其實他這個檢驗是在外送
00:07:15,000 00:07:17,000 但是這些制度早就都有了
00:07:17,000 00:07:18,000 法律都有了
00:07:18,000 00:07:20,000 過去的通報的責任只限制在
00:07:20,000 00:07:21,000 法律都有了
00:07:21,000 00:07:22,000 所以我們希望能夠
00:07:22,000 00:07:24,000 你說要提高罰則我沒意見
00:07:24,000 00:07:26,000 但是很多東西你說該做的
00:07:26,000 00:07:27,000 要修法要做的
00:07:27,000 00:07:29,000 法律早就都有了
00:07:29,000 00:07:30,000 我們希望讓他
00:07:30,000 00:07:33,000 我跟你講行政機關不能責任都往外推
00:07:34,000 00:07:36,000 要嘛中央這次我看到了
00:07:36,000 00:07:37,000 中央就推給地方
00:07:37,000 00:07:40,000 食安的問題中央推給地方
00:07:40,000 00:07:42,000 然後我們有意見之後
00:07:42,000 00:07:43,000 又推給立法院
00:07:43,000 00:07:44,000 原來我們立法不足
00:07:44,000 00:07:46,000 事實上我剛已經告訴你了
00:07:46,000 00:07:47,000 我們的法律早就有了
00:07:47,000 00:07:49,000 是你們沒有做好
00:07:49,000 00:07:51,000 然後你現在就推說
00:07:51,000 00:07:53,000 立法法律不足我現在要推修法
00:07:53,000 00:07:56,000 你修來修去他還是早就有那個法律在
00:07:56,000 00:07:59,000 所以我看到的是被人家發現問題以後
00:07:59,000 00:08:01,000 中央推地方機關
00:08:01,000 00:08:04,000 不然就行政院推立法院
00:08:04,000 00:08:07,000 這樣不是一個負責任政府該有的樣子
00:08:07,000 00:08:10,000 那我請問一下這一次你們十大修正的
00:08:10,000 00:08:12,000 重點裡面有沒有要求業者
00:08:12,000 00:08:15,000 即時上傳自主檢驗的資料
00:08:15,000 00:08:20,000 還是那個你們有沒有要求他們這個部分
00:08:20,000 00:08:22,000 我們要求的是檢驗室
00:08:22,000 00:08:24,000 不要再透過業者
00:08:24,000 00:08:26,000 所以檢驗室就要上傳
00:08:26,000 00:08:28,000 請問一下你們這一次
00:08:28,000 00:08:29,000 修法的部分有沒有提到
00:08:29,000 00:08:32,000 有行政機關獨立採樣或全程監督
00:08:32,000 00:08:33,000 有沒有提到這個部分
00:08:33,000 00:08:35,000 這一次也把它修進去
00:08:35,000 00:08:36,000 那是在哪一條
00:08:36,000 00:08:37,000 過去是得
00:08:37,000 00:08:38,000 是在哪一條
00:08:38,000 00:08:39,000 在41條
00:08:39,000 00:08:43,000 地方主管機關就可以得執行查場跟抽驗
00:08:43,000 00:08:45,000 那這一次我們會把它改成因
00:08:45,000 00:08:47,000 那以後一定要這樣做
00:08:47,000 00:08:50,000 好你們有把這個地方補這個地方是不是
00:08:50,000 00:08:51,000
00:08:51,000 00:08:53,000 那因為我要跟你們講的就是說
00:08:53,000 00:08:56,000 我們現在看到的你們的作為
00:08:56,000 00:08:59,000 會讓業者會找一個洞來鑽
00:08:59,000 00:09:02,000 結果我們相關的行政處罰
00:09:02,000 00:09:05,000 都只有去處罰到可能偷懶的人
00:09:05,000 00:09:08,000 但是造假的你們都束手無策
00:09:08,000 00:09:09,000 我這次看到的是這樣
00:09:09,000 00:09:11,000 然後你只是告訴我們說
00:09:11,000 00:09:14,000 不排除中聯他們掉包樣品
00:09:14,000 00:09:15,000 但是呢
00:09:15,000 00:09:17,000 你們卻對於這個有沒有掉包
00:09:17,000 00:09:18,000 你們卻束手無策
00:09:18,000 00:09:21,000 事實上這個東西本來就可以經由
00:09:21,000 00:09:24,000 你們自己主動介入去抽查
00:09:24,000 00:09:26,000 去你們強制自己
00:09:26,000 00:09:30,000 你們留下樣樣本的方式來解決
00:09:30,000 00:09:31,000 這個本來都可以解決
00:09:31,000 00:09:32,000 不是不能解決
00:09:32,000 00:09:35,000 所以我要現在要講的就是說
00:09:35,000 00:09:38,000 我們其實不是缺乏法律
00:09:38,000 00:09:40,000 我們是缺乏你們怎麼執行
00:09:40,000 00:09:42,000 還有你們證據怎麼保存
00:09:42,000 00:09:44,000 我希望這一次不要到最後
00:09:44,000 00:09:46,000 又變成一審法院又判無罪
00:09:46,000 00:09:48,000 因為他認為說證據能力有問題
00:09:48,000 00:09:50,000 或是證據證明力有問題
00:09:50,000 00:09:51,000 那這個都不行
00:09:51,000 00:09:54,000 還有那個我要講的一個
00:09:54,000 00:09:57,000 你們花了10億去做的那個食品雲
00:09:57,000 00:09:58,000 也有問題啊
00:09:58,000 00:10:00,000 你這次花了10億去做
00:10:00,000 00:10:02,000 結果2.75萬噸的油流去哪裡
00:10:02,000 00:10:05,000 還是靠公務員一通電話這樣打
00:10:05,000 00:10:06,000 這個也不對啊
00:10:06,000 00:10:08,000 然後再來報告你們
00:10:08,000 00:10:11,000 裡面你們提到了即時兩個字
00:10:11,000 00:10:13,000 結果呢我們看到的是
00:10:13,000 00:10:14,000 6月30號通報
00:10:14,000 00:10:17,000 7月20號才委託食品所
00:10:17,000 00:10:18,000 要成立調查小組
00:10:18,000 00:10:21,000 所以所謂的即時我也看不到
00:10:21,000 00:10:24,000 三個禮拜我認為這個不叫即時
00:10:24,000 00:10:26,000 所以我還是要跟你們說明一個點
00:10:26,000 00:10:29,000 就因為我自己是請阿寬出生
00:10:29,000 00:10:31,000 但是我後來轉去念公共衛生
00:10:31,000 00:10:34,000 所以相關的專業治理
00:10:34,000 00:10:36,000 我想我還是沒有辦法接受
00:10:36,000 00:10:37,000 你們很多地方
00:10:37,000 00:10:38,000 就像我剛剛講的
00:10:38,000 00:10:41,000 你們說的那個20%的標準
00:10:41,000 00:10:43,000 我到現在我還找不到
00:10:43,000 00:10:45,000 科學的依據在哪裡
00:10:45,000 00:10:46,000 我問了我很多同學
00:10:46,000 00:10:47,000 我問了我很多老師
00:10:47,000 00:10:50,000 他們都是公衛生專業的
00:10:50,000 00:10:51,000 甚至臨床醫師
00:10:51,000 00:10:52,000 他們也講不出來
00:10:52,000 00:10:54,000 所謂的致癌物質20%以下
00:10:54,000 00:10:55,000 這是可容許範圍
00:10:55,000 00:10:59,000 從來我不知道這個數據是從何來
00:10:59,000 00:11:01,000 一個行政機關這麼專業的機關
00:11:01,000 00:11:02,000 可以這麼做
00:11:02,000 00:11:04,000 我是覺得不可思議啦
00:11:04,000 00:11:06,000 因為我跟你講
00:11:06,000 00:11:08,000 跟部長報告一件事情
00:11:08,000 00:11:10,000 今天這是我很不高興
00:11:10,000 00:11:12,000 我認為要替人民講話就是
00:11:12,000 00:11:15,000 我爸爸媽媽都80幾歲了
00:11:15,000 00:11:17,000 我小孩兩個多月
00:11:17,000 00:11:18,000 我讓他們吃這種東西
00:11:18,000 00:11:20,000 我一定跟你拼命
00:11:20,000 00:11:21,000 哪一個業者哪有毒的東西
00:11:21,000 00:11:22,000 給我的爸媽吃
00:11:22,000 00:11:23,000 給我的小孩吃
00:11:23,000 00:11:25,000 我一定跟你拼命
00:11:25,000 00:11:26,000 所以今天這個事情
00:11:26,000 00:11:28,000 我不能容許這樣發生
00:11:28,000 00:11:30,000 更何況受害的是我們全國的人民
00:11:30,000 00:11:31,000 好不好
00:11:31,000 00:11:33,000 所以麻煩你們這件事情真的
00:11:33,000 00:11:34,000 要趕快處理
00:11:34,000 00:11:35,000 我跟委員報告
00:11:35,000 00:11:37,000 我的感受是跟你一樣
00:11:37,000 00:11:38,000 所以對這個業者
00:11:38,000 00:11:40,000 我們要給予最嚴厲的處分
00:11:40,000 00:11:43,000 那麼至於剛剛的下架標準
00:11:43,000 00:11:44,000 也跟委員說明
00:11:44,000 00:11:46,000 我們過去的下架標準
00:11:46,000 00:11:47,000 跟歐盟是一樣
00:11:47,000 00:11:49,000 那這一次我們採比歐盟
00:11:49,000 00:11:51,000 更高的下架標準
00:11:51,000 00:11:52,000 我知道
00:11:52,000 00:11:53,000 就是下架標準
00:11:53,000 00:11:55,000 我們是比歐盟還要嚴
00:11:55,000 00:11:56,000 我沒有問題
00:11:56,000 00:11:58,000 你現在最後全部都下架了
00:11:58,000 00:11:59,000 那我沒有意見
00:11:59,000 00:12:00,000 我只跟你說那20%
00:12:00,000 00:12:01,000 到現在我還是找不到任何
00:12:01,000 00:12:04,000 因為歐盟只有低層有品下架
00:12:04,000 00:12:05,000 我們是比歐盟下架的
00:12:05,000 00:12:06,000 我知道
00:12:06,000 00:12:07,000 我講東你講西嘛
00:12:07,000 00:12:08,000 部長
00:12:08,000 00:12:10,000 部長我不是外行人
00:12:10,000 00:12:11,000 好不好
00:12:11,000 00:12:12,000 我不是外行人
00:12:12,000 00:12:14,000 我講東你講西
00:12:14,000 00:12:15,000 你講你全面下架
00:12:15,000 00:12:16,000 我沒意見
00:12:16,000 00:12:18,000 歐盟是低層下架
00:12:18,000 00:12:19,000 我也沒有意見
00:12:19,000 00:12:21,000 但是我要跟你們報告的是
00:12:21,000 00:12:22,000 20%的數據
00:12:22,000 00:12:24,000 沒有任何科學依據
00:12:24,000 00:12:26,000 我不懂為什麼行政機關
00:12:26,000 00:12:27,000 可以拿這個東西
00:12:27,000 00:12:30,000 然後來讓我們又多吃了好多天
00:12:30,000 00:12:31,000 我的意思在這裡
00:12:31,000 00:12:32,000 那也麻煩你們
00:12:32,000 00:12:34,000 那也麻煩法務部在
00:12:34,000 00:12:36,000 將來的稽查上面
00:12:36,000 00:12:37,000 偵查上面
00:12:37,000 00:12:38,000 能夠更積極的作為
00:12:38,000 00:12:39,000 好謝謝兩位部長
00:12:39,000 00:12:40,000 謝謝
00:12:40,000 00:12:41,000 謝謝