iVOD / 170856

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

劉建國 @ 第11屆第5會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第22次全體委員會議

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:10,000 好 謝謝主席 有請部長
00:00:10,000 00:00:12,000 好 請石部長
00:00:12,000 00:00:16,000 柳委員好
00:00:16,000 00:00:23,000 部長好 部長我要來釐清這個中聯問題遊品的這個事件
00:00:23,000 00:00:25,000 你看這個時序看這樣對不對
00:00:25,000 00:00:27,000 我要再跟你double check一下
00:00:27,000 00:00:31,000 5月4號台黨知道中聯遊這個本免費超標嘛
00:00:31,000 00:00:36,000 然後再來5月18號是台黨拒收這該批的原料
00:00:36,000 00:00:40,000 6月4號南橋遊子自行送驗死發現異常
00:00:40,000 00:00:44,000 10號南橋遊子同時上友廠商扶壽公司
00:00:44,000 00:00:47,000 30號中聯遊子正式向食藥署通報
00:00:47,000 00:00:49,000 這這樣的時序對嗎
00:00:49,000 00:00:50,000 欸不對
00:00:50,000 00:00:51,000 不對
00:00:51,000 00:00:54,000 那個更早是南橋在5月13號
00:00:54,000 00:01:00,000 他就已經驗出他自驗的第一個這個遊品超標
00:01:00,000 00:01:01,000
00:01:01,000 00:01:02,000 這是5月13號
00:01:02,000 00:01:07,000 就是我們第一批這個要求下架的那一批是他驗出來的
00:01:07,000 00:01:08,000 5月13號
00:01:08,000 00:01:09,000
00:01:09,000 00:01:10,000 OK
00:01:10,000 00:01:14,000 那5月15號驗的又不同
00:01:14,000 00:01:16,000 他那個是脫交原油
00:01:16,000 00:01:18,000 並不是他沒有批號的
00:01:18,000 00:01:21,000 5月13號南橋驗的那個是有批號
00:01:21,000 00:01:25,000 那個是0404的批號
00:01:25,000 00:01:26,000 0404嘛
00:01:26,000 00:01:27,000
00:01:27,000 00:01:31,000 就是4月的那個遊品
00:01:31,000 00:01:33,000 好沒關係我大致上這樣
00:01:33,000 00:01:37,000 就成本部長剛剛有更正我們再來做一個修正
00:01:37,000 00:01:39,000 那我是通過媒體報導裡面
00:01:39,000 00:01:40,000 應該就可以去斷定嘛
00:01:40,000 00:01:45,000 中聯他最少在4月份就知道他的油應該是有問題
00:01:45,000 00:01:48,000 4月就應該知道了
00:01:48,000 00:01:50,000 所以我在提供這個時序的時候
00:01:50,000 00:01:53,000 又可以發現他5月就知道了
00:01:53,000 00:01:54,000 最慢
00:01:55,000 00:01:57,000 應該最早是5月前
00:01:57,000 00:01:59,000 在最慢就是5月
00:01:59,000 00:02:01,000 中聯自己知道他的油是有狀況的
00:02:01,000 00:02:03,000 對因為這個
00:02:03,000 00:02:05,000 據我們現在的了解
00:02:05,000 00:02:11,000 5月15號台糖去送驗出這一個槽裡面
00:02:11,000 00:02:13,000 他的這個VAP值之後
00:02:13,000 00:02:16,000 中聯有自己再驗一次
00:02:16,000 00:02:19,000 所以他這一批就停在那裡
00:02:19,000 00:02:20,000 就沒有再繼續做
00:02:20,000 00:02:22,000 不過當時候他就應該了解
00:02:22,000 00:02:25,000 他的整個製程或者是顏料上
00:02:25,000 00:02:28,000 他就應該回頭去做一些處理
00:02:28,000 00:02:32,000 那麼這個更謹慎的他後面的一些
00:02:32,000 00:02:34,000 後續因為他還有很多批要出貨
00:02:34,000 00:02:37,000 就應該要開始逐批檢驗了
00:02:38,000 00:02:40,000 他要賣貨給人家
00:02:40,000 00:02:42,000 對方拒絕他
00:02:42,000 00:02:43,000 對不對
00:02:43,000 00:02:47,000 所以他應該也要給台糖一個收穫才對
00:02:47,000 00:02:48,000
00:02:48,000 00:02:50,000 應該是沒有
00:02:50,000 00:02:52,000 應該是沒有說
00:02:56,000 00:02:58,000 怎麼說就是他沒有去
00:02:59,000 00:03:02,000 中聯是不是到底怎麼去跟台糖講的
00:03:02,000 00:03:04,000 總是有個說法
00:03:04,000 00:03:07,000 這個說法到底怎麼樣我們不清楚
00:03:07,000 00:03:11,000 不過當拒絕跟他購買這些
00:03:11,000 00:03:15,000 這些原料的時候
00:03:16,000 00:03:23,000 我在想說這個事情怎麼會到現在才去弄出來
00:03:23,000 00:03:25,000 這是一件事情
00:03:25,000 00:03:26,000 那第二件事情
00:03:26,000 00:03:29,000 也就是不管4月中你自己知不知道
00:03:29,000 00:03:31,000 到5月中他就必須知道
00:03:31,000 00:03:33,000 而且他的油品已經被退貨
00:03:33,000 00:03:35,000 有問題的部分
00:03:35,000 00:03:36,000 不然6月12有知道
00:03:36,000 00:03:39,000 結果拖到6月13才主動通報
00:03:39,000 00:03:41,000 這個中間中聯到底要幹什麼
00:03:41,000 00:03:45,000 滿天過海企圖在下面證據
00:03:45,000 00:03:47,000 也不可能
00:03:47,000 00:03:49,000 也不可能
00:03:49,000 00:03:50,000 對不對
00:03:50,000 00:03:53,000 不過我今天要凸顯這個問題是要跟部長講說
00:03:53,000 00:03:55,000 從這個時間表來看
00:03:55,000 00:03:58,000 我覺得人性不可信
00:03:58,000 00:04:01,000 人性沒辦法相信
00:04:01,000 00:04:03,000 依食安法的規定
00:04:03,000 00:04:06,000 台糖購買中聯的半成品不需通報
00:04:06,000 00:04:08,000 所以台糖沒有通報
00:04:08,000 00:04:09,000 但依食安法的規定
00:04:09,000 00:04:11,000 應該主動通報的南僑也沒有通報
00:04:11,000 00:04:13,000 為什麼
00:04:13,000 00:04:17,000 因為南僑拿到的是已經是油品了
00:04:17,000 00:04:18,000
00:04:18,000 00:04:20,000 它已經是食用油品了
00:04:20,000 00:04:21,000
00:04:21,000 00:04:23,000 那麼台糖去驗的這個叫脫膠原油
00:04:23,000 00:04:24,000 脫膠原油
00:04:24,000 00:04:26,000 它並不是油品
00:04:26,000 00:04:29,000 那我們現在訂的扁平比標準指的就是
00:04:29,000 00:04:32,000 食用油脂的這個油品的標準
00:04:32,000 00:04:34,000 不是那個脫膠原油的標準
00:04:35,000 00:04:39,000 但是部長我是想用另外一個層次去看待這個事情
00:04:39,000 00:04:40,000 就是說
00:04:40,000 00:04:42,000 不管台糖不管南僑
00:04:42,000 00:04:43,000
00:04:43,000 00:04:46,000 他們全部都是生意上往來的夥伴
00:04:46,000 00:04:47,000 沒有錯
00:04:47,000 00:04:48,000
00:04:48,000 00:04:50,000 也因為這樣台糖南僑福壽福茂中聯
00:04:50,000 00:04:54,000 不管是生意往來或是子母公司的關係鏈
00:04:54,000 00:04:58,000 所以你要這些業者互相把關主動監督
00:04:58,000 00:05:01,000 那又是在挑戰人性
00:05:01,000 00:05:02,000
00:05:02,000 00:05:05,000 所以我們未來修法上就是希望
00:05:05,000 00:05:06,000 因為他都是送外驗
00:05:06,000 00:05:08,000 這個第三個檢驗單位
00:05:08,000 00:05:11,000 所以檢驗單位加上他可以通報
00:05:11,000 00:05:13,000 那我們就可以提早有預警
00:05:13,000 00:05:17,000 那甚至在報的部分的這個檢驗的結果
00:05:17,000 00:05:20,000 我們也可以來討論更往前一點
00:05:20,000 00:05:22,000 一些重要的節點上
00:05:22,000 00:05:25,000 就把這個資料傳到這個主管機關來
00:05:25,000 00:05:28,000 我們就可以更早有這個風險的預警
00:05:28,000 00:05:29,000
00:05:29,000 00:05:31,000 所以說真的是沒有人可以保證
00:05:31,000 00:05:35,000 以後絕對不會再有這個下游業者發生問題
00:05:35,000 00:05:37,000 那上游製造業者用商業的壓力
00:05:37,000 00:05:39,000 人情壓力等各種方式
00:05:39,000 00:05:42,000 讓下游的業者不要去做通報
00:05:42,000 00:05:43,000 這可能會再發生
00:05:43,000 00:05:44,000 對不對
00:05:44,000 00:05:48,000 然後所以法律的修訂
00:05:48,000 00:05:50,000 法律的制定不能去挑戰人性
00:05:50,000 00:05:52,000 實在就是如此
00:05:52,000 00:05:55,000 我想就是必須要有堅強的外部監製
00:05:55,000 00:05:56,000
00:05:56,000 00:05:57,000 這樣的一個制度存在
00:05:57,000 00:05:58,000 對不對
00:05:58,000 00:06:01,000 所以我在我想本席在這次訊號裡面
00:06:01,000 00:06:04,000 提案特別要求要增加公衛師食品技師
00:06:04,000 00:06:06,000 在食品檢驗上的職能
00:06:06,000 00:06:10,000 透過他們的監督才能落實這個食安的檢查
00:06:10,000 00:06:12,000 我想是這個樣子
00:06:12,000 00:06:14,000 所以不只是增加外部的稽查
00:06:14,000 00:06:16,000 政府的查採也是非常重要
00:06:16,000 00:06:20,000 就像台南市他可以擴大抽驗23件流品
00:06:20,000 00:06:22,000 現在又發現3件的苦茶油
00:06:22,000 00:06:25,000 當中這本扁比又是超標
00:06:25,000 00:06:27,000 然後為什麼現在才發現
00:06:27,000 00:06:30,000 這是顯然過去地方單位在抽驗上
00:06:30,000 00:06:32,000 還是都有些問題的存在
00:06:32,000 00:06:34,000 還是都有些問題的存在
00:06:34,000 00:06:37,000 所以今天原本要修
00:06:37,000 00:06:38,000 現在又拖到現在
00:06:38,000 00:06:40,000 所以如果根據三法第七條
00:06:40,000 00:06:43,000 授權應訂定食品安全監測計畫
00:06:43,000 00:06:46,000 與應辦理檢驗之食品業者
00:06:46,000 00:06:49,000 最低檢驗週期及其他相關事項
00:06:49,000 00:06:51,000 這個部分
00:06:51,000 00:06:53,000 我不會打算什麼時候修
00:06:53,000 00:06:55,000 現在已經在進行修正
00:06:55,000 00:06:57,000 我們會把它用成一個辦法
00:06:57,000 00:07:00,000 然後去訂出不同的檢驗頻率
00:07:00,000 00:07:02,000 上下層
00:07:02,000 00:07:03,000 如果是最上層
00:07:03,000 00:07:04,000 以中聯為例
00:07:04,000 00:07:06,000 中聯這個都會要求他
00:07:06,000 00:07:08,000 逐批檢驗
00:07:08,000 00:07:10,000 然後下面第二層的
00:07:10,000 00:07:13,000 這個泰山服售的話就是案技檢驗
00:07:13,000 00:07:16,000 我們就會提高他的檢驗的頻率
00:07:16,000 00:07:18,000 但是這個其他的事項
00:07:18,000 00:07:22,000 基本上有需要我們再修食安法過之後
00:07:22,000 00:07:23,000 這個不用
00:07:23,000 00:07:25,000 受權我們就會做
00:07:25,000 00:07:26,000 所以這個應該就可以
00:07:26,000 00:07:27,000 可以馬上來找手
00:07:27,000 00:07:29,000 來做一些調整
00:07:29,000 00:07:31,000 因為目前辦法中明訂
00:07:31,000 00:07:33,000 資本的3千萬以上的
00:07:33,000 00:07:35,000 使用由此製造工廠
00:07:35,000 00:07:37,000 及辦理商業登記公司登記
00:07:37,000 00:07:39,000 每半年或每批檢驗
00:07:39,000 00:07:40,000 至少一次
00:07:40,000 00:07:42,000 然後事實上地方政府
00:07:42,000 00:07:45,000 也沒有照衛福部食藥署這個標準
00:07:45,000 00:07:47,000 每半年或每批抽
00:07:47,000 00:07:50,000 才導致今天中聯這個問題有
00:07:50,000 00:07:52,000 甚至於股差多出現本便比
00:07:52,000 00:07:54,000 應該是這樣
00:07:54,000 00:07:57,000 所以如果依照這個抽驗標準
00:07:57,000 00:08:00,000 應該就是趕快來修
00:08:00,000 00:08:02,000 全面提高抽驗的一個標準
00:08:02,000 00:08:06,000 所以食安不能等
00:08:06,000 00:08:07,000 那食安法
00:08:07,000 00:08:08,000 跟委員說明
00:08:08,000 00:08:10,000 我們現在其他這個大豆的
00:08:10,000 00:08:13,000 另外這個最上游的這三家
00:08:13,000 00:08:16,000 包含台糖大統一還有常輝
00:08:16,000 00:08:18,000 都已經要求逐批檢驗了
00:08:18,000 00:08:19,000 現在已經在做了
00:08:19,000 00:08:21,000 已經要求他們逐批檢驗了
00:08:21,000 00:08:24,000 我想食安法送到立法院
00:08:24,000 00:08:26,000 一定會用最快速度來修
00:08:26,000 00:08:27,000 不過像今天這樣
00:08:27,000 00:08:29,000 我們要審查現在排專報
00:08:29,000 00:08:31,000 那可能今天就可能
00:08:31,000 00:08:34,000 可能今天就會來不及處理
00:08:34,000 00:08:35,000 所以我才會說
00:08:35,000 00:08:39,000 這個標準這個辦法
00:08:39,000 00:08:41,000 是不是應該藉助來處理
00:08:41,000 00:08:42,000
00:08:42,000 00:08:44,000 因為這才是我們小館的
00:08:44,000 00:08:45,000 相關的報告跟標準
00:08:45,000 00:08:46,000 就先行
00:08:46,000 00:08:47,000 就先行
00:08:47,000 00:08:48,000 不要等到食安法過後
00:08:48,000 00:08:49,000 再來慢慢修
00:08:49,000 00:08:50,000 部長可以認同嗎
00:08:50,000 00:08:51,000 可以
00:08:51,000 00:08:53,000 這個多久可以提出最新的版本
00:08:53,000 00:08:54,000 來進行公告
00:08:54,000 00:08:56,000 因為我們現在已經要求業者做了
00:08:56,000 00:08:57,000 但是我們這個還是要
00:08:57,000 00:09:00,000 按照這個法規預告的程序
00:09:00,000 00:09:02,000 我們在應該可以
00:09:02,000 00:09:04,000 近期就提出預告
00:09:04,000 00:09:06,000 因為我們大概已經修好
00:09:06,000 00:09:07,000 你的近期是多近期
00:09:07,000 00:09:08,000 明天
00:09:08,000 00:09:10,000 下禮拜
00:09:10,000 00:09:12,000 下禮拜預告應該是沒有問題
00:09:12,000 00:09:13,000 下禮拜預告
00:09:13,000 00:09:14,000
00:09:14,000 00:09:15,000 好謝謝
00:09:15,000 00:09:19,000 我們先修了這個食安法的草案
00:09:19,000 00:09:20,000 這個是授權辦法
00:09:20,000 00:09:22,000 我們同步在進行
00:09:22,000 00:09:24,000 所以這個我們內部上已經
00:09:24,000 00:09:26,000 下週就可以預告了
00:09:26,000 00:09:27,000 下週就可以預告
00:09:27,000 00:09:28,000 好謝謝
00:09:28,000 00:09:29,000 好部長再看
00:09:29,000 00:09:31,000 還是雖然先不分回去
00:09:31,000 00:09:34,000 772公民團體到衛福部門口陳情
00:09:34,000 00:09:37,000 這個部長有掌握吧
00:09:37,000 00:09:39,000 年短料推的透明餐桌
00:09:39,000 00:09:43,000 年俗預修法標示主要原料產地
00:09:43,000 00:09:46,000 那這個上下有文化經濟會指出
00:09:46,000 00:09:49,000 現行制度下國外原料經加工後
00:09:49,000 00:09:51,000 及可標示為台灣製造
00:09:51,000 00:09:53,000 消費者難以辨識主要原料來源
00:09:53,000 00:09:56,000 也因此才會發起透明餐桌的連署
00:09:56,000 00:09:58,000 要求主管機關來修法
00:09:58,000 00:10:00,000 並在政策制定過程中
00:10:00,000 00:10:01,000 落實社會對話
00:10:01,000 00:10:04,000 提升食品標示的透明度
00:10:04,000 00:10:06,000 有掌握吧
00:10:06,000 00:10:08,000 這個我們也有在研究
00:10:08,000 00:10:09,000 其實跟委員說
00:10:09,000 00:10:11,000 我們今年7月1號開始
00:10:11,000 00:10:14,000 所有的這個要稱為鮮乳的
00:10:14,000 00:10:17,000 它一定是要台灣的牛牛奶
00:10:17,000 00:10:19,000 才可以稱為鮮乳
00:10:19,000 00:10:21,000 其他都只能外國來的都
00:10:21,000 00:10:23,000 你到台灣來加工也沒有用
00:10:23,000 00:10:24,000 都只能稱為牛乳
00:10:24,000 00:10:25,000 所以有這種區別
00:10:25,000 00:10:27,000 這個我處理過我知道
00:10:27,000 00:10:28,000 而且在14天內
00:10:28,000 00:10:29,000 這個也處理很久
00:10:29,000 00:10:31,000 三個部會說幾步就對了
00:10:31,000 00:10:32,000
00:10:32,000 00:10:35,000 未來我也會朝這個方向來
00:10:35,000 00:10:38,000 凸顯這個在地的食材
00:10:38,000 00:10:42,000 那麼製造的原料跟它的食品
00:10:42,000 00:10:44,000 對啦所以部長用鮮乳這事情來講
00:10:44,000 00:10:46,000 我想我在處理過程裡面
00:10:46,000 00:10:47,000 我非常清楚
00:10:47,000 00:10:50,000 然後用這樣的比喻也很適切
00:10:50,000 00:10:52,000 所以這個是
00:10:52,000 00:10:54,000 其實這是很重要的食材問題
00:10:54,000 00:10:57,000 目前法規上不對原料來源
00:10:57,000 00:10:58,000 只要在台灣加工之後
00:10:58,000 00:11:00,000 就叫做台灣製造
00:11:00,000 00:11:03,000 那鮮乳不可能就不可能了嘛
00:11:03,000 00:11:04,000 對不對
00:11:04,000 00:11:06,000 那對於台灣還有一個
00:11:06,000 00:11:08,000 有機也不可能啊
00:11:08,000 00:11:11,000 那對台灣長期經營的MIT的招牌
00:11:11,000 00:11:13,000 坦白講如果這個不趕快去修
00:11:13,000 00:11:14,000 其實對台灣是不好的
00:11:14,000 00:11:16,000 對我們的招牌是不好的嘛
00:11:16,000 00:11:20,000 所以有意要支持台灣本地的農產品的民眾
00:11:20,000 00:11:21,000 他也是會非常混淆
00:11:21,000 00:11:27,000 所以對鮮乳種植的原物料的人民來講
00:11:27,000 00:11:28,000 更是不公平
00:11:28,000 00:11:29,000 我有去盤點啦
00:11:29,000 00:11:31,000 就是諸如澳洲加拿大日本
00:11:31,000 00:11:33,000 南韓都有相關的規定
00:11:33,000 00:11:34,000 甚至於南韓細緻到
00:11:34,000 00:11:38,000 前三大原料都要標明原料國
00:11:38,000 00:11:41,000 這個表格部長簡單看一下
00:11:41,000 00:11:42,000 四個國家
00:11:42,000 00:11:46,000 那本次我們提案的這個版本中
00:11:46,000 00:11:50,000 第22條就在享用公民團體支持活動
00:11:50,000 00:11:52,000 要求加工食品應標示
00:11:52,000 00:11:55,000 其主要食品原料之原產地
00:11:55,000 00:11:58,000 所以這次修法中我要請部長
00:11:58,000 00:11:59,000 署長可以支持
00:11:59,000 00:12:01,000 也請文匯可以支持
00:12:01,000 00:12:03,000 我們一同保護MIT的招牌
00:12:03,000 00:12:05,000 在乎我們本土人民
00:12:05,000 00:12:07,000 也讓保障消費者執勤的權益
00:12:07,000 00:12:09,000 可以吧
00:12:09,000 00:12:12,000 坦白講我那天是有跟書長講
00:12:12,000 00:12:16,000 這個我覺得我們還是要加快腳步
00:12:16,000 00:12:18,000 不一定要等到我們現在
00:12:18,000 00:12:20,000 在處理這個修法的方式
00:12:20,000 00:12:22,000 這其實現在是可以做
00:12:22,000 00:12:24,000 台灣的有機就直接標示了
00:12:24,000 00:12:25,000
00:12:25,000 00:12:27,000 台灣的有機就要直接標示了
00:12:27,000 00:12:30,000 用標示的要求
00:12:30,000 00:12:33,000 好嗎
00:12:33,000 00:12:35,000 時間到了你先檢討一下
00:12:35,000 00:12:38,000 我希望是不是能在那個辦法的修訂
00:12:38,000 00:12:39,000 下禮拜的公告
00:12:39,000 00:12:42,000 連這件事情也一併可以來解決
00:12:42,000 00:12:43,000
00:12:43,000 00:12:45,000 請部長跟署長
00:12:45,000 00:12:47,000 謝謝