iVOD / 170703

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

洪毓祥 @ 第11屆第5會期司法及法制委員會第26次全體委員會議

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:13,000 好 謝謝主席 我們有請經濟部跟聯政署
00:00:13,000 00:00:21,000 麻煩請經濟部的政次江政次 還有聯政署
00:00:21,000 00:00:22,000 委員好
00:00:22,000 00:00:24,000 聯政署署長
00:00:24,000 00:00:27,000 聯政署署長 謝謝署長
00:00:27,000 00:00:32,000 我想這個題目在我們經濟委員會擔任召委的時候
00:00:32,000 00:00:35,000 也有排過類似這樣的機制
00:00:35,000 00:00:37,000 我想我今天延續了
00:00:37,000 00:00:42,000 因為可能在這個委員會沒有看過這個案子的全貌
00:00:42,000 00:00:45,000 其實就是整個在蘇巧淳這樣的案子
00:00:45,000 00:00:50,000 我想在這個經濟部還有從來底下的國發會
00:00:50,000 00:00:52,000 這些都清楚
00:00:52,000 00:00:57,000 重點並不是說蘇巧淳因為是這個蘇巧慧的妹妹
00:00:57,000 00:00:58,000 蘇貞昌的女兒
00:00:58,000 00:01:01,000 她不能夠申請補助
00:01:01,000 00:01:04,000 這一點一定要嚴正視聽
00:01:04,000 00:01:07,000 也就是說這個只要是公開的對不對
00:01:07,000 00:01:11,000 公平 不管它是補助案 投資 交易等等
00:01:11,000 00:01:13,000 她都有資格
00:01:13,000 00:01:17,000 這個是要確認 不要被亂洗的
00:01:17,000 00:01:18,000 並不是她不可以
00:01:18,000 00:01:22,000 可以 現在的問題就是在今天的利充法這邊
00:01:22,000 00:01:25,000 那這個利充法我們上次已經都談過了
00:01:25,000 00:01:27,000 整個這個過程
00:01:27,000 00:01:29,000 我們假設先不看國發會
00:01:29,000 00:01:31,000 我們先看跟經濟部有關的
00:01:31,000 00:01:33,000 在商發署補助
00:01:33,000 00:01:37,000 不管是礦石智能 微爐科技這邊
00:01:37,000 00:01:39,000 大概都是成立的 也沒有問題
00:01:39,000 00:01:41,000 但是有問題的是
00:01:41,000 00:01:45,000 這個在我們利充法的規範裡頭
00:01:45,000 00:01:48,000 它必須要去揭露
00:01:48,000 00:01:50,000 也就是說我在申請案件的時候
00:01:50,000 00:01:54,000 它要揭露 我是利害關係人
00:01:54,000 00:01:55,000 所以它要填表
00:01:55,000 00:01:58,000 所以當時商發署也有回說
00:01:58,000 00:02:00,000 有些表格要填
00:02:00,000 00:02:01,000 但是很不幸的
00:02:01,000 00:02:04,000 它這個蘇巧淳等等這個案子
00:02:04,000 00:02:06,000 它是沒有填
00:02:06,000 00:02:09,000 那你們給我的回覆是
00:02:09,000 00:02:11,000 它填到哪裡去呢
00:02:11,000 00:02:15,000 就是它認為這一塊地方來講的話
00:02:15,000 00:02:19,000 我在你們的這個監察院的
00:02:19,000 00:02:20,000 公職員 關係人
00:02:20,000 00:02:22,000 補助教育跟身份關於查詢平台
00:02:22,000 00:02:26,000 是查不到這一筆的資料
00:02:26,000 00:02:28,000 那這個東西它認為
00:02:28,000 00:02:30,000 這個要由廉政署
00:02:30,000 00:02:33,000 來做一些事法上的一個詮釋
00:02:33,000 00:02:36,000 那我不曉得這個後續的回應處理
00:02:36,000 00:02:40,000 廉政署這邊處理了嗎
00:02:40,000 00:02:42,000 是 跟委員報告
00:02:42,000 00:02:46,000 依照我們公職人員利益衝突回避法
00:02:46,000 00:02:49,000 第14條的第一項的規定
00:02:49,000 00:02:51,000 公職人員或其關係人
00:02:51,000 00:02:53,000 不得與公職人員服務
00:02:53,000 00:02:55,000 或授旗監督機關團體
00:02:55,000 00:02:59,000 為補助 買賣 租賃 承攬
00:02:59,000 00:03:02,000 或其他具有對價關係的行為
00:03:02,000 00:03:05,000 它前提是必須要符合這一些的規定
00:03:05,000 00:03:08,000 才有後續的一個揭露
00:03:08,000 00:03:10,000 那個揭露也不是全部都
00:03:10,000 00:03:11,000 所有都要揭露
00:03:11,000 00:03:16,000 是符合這裡第一項所列的一至三款
00:03:16,000 00:03:19,000 這樣的條件才有揭露的一個義務
00:03:19,000 00:03:21,000 所以你認為不需要揭露
00:03:21,000 00:03:23,000 要看它什麼樣的一線
00:03:23,000 00:03:25,000 如果符合的話是要揭露
00:03:25,000 00:03:26,000 它就是符合啦
00:03:26,000 00:03:28,000 如果不符合的話就不需要
00:03:28,000 00:03:29,000 它就是符合啦
00:03:29,000 00:03:30,000 那這一件是不是符合
00:03:30,000 00:03:32,000 這個不是我們全管
00:03:32,000 00:03:35,000 這個是屬於主管機關它全管的範圍
00:03:35,000 00:03:36,000 我沒有辦法
00:03:36,000 00:03:37,000 所以它推給你啊
00:03:37,000 00:03:40,000 不是推這個法律規定如此
00:03:40,000 00:03:43,000 它的回覆給我的是說廉政署啊
00:03:45,000 00:03:49,000 我們不是對於這個實際上的補助
00:03:49,000 00:03:51,000 或者是什麼投資行為
00:03:51,000 00:03:52,000 我們不是它的機關
00:03:52,000 00:03:54,000 你是投資啊這是補助耶補助耶
00:03:54,000 00:03:55,000 我們不是它的機關
00:03:55,000 00:03:58,000 我們是法我們對這個法律的規定是如此
00:03:58,000 00:04:01,000 我是跟委員報我們對法律解釋如此
00:04:01,000 00:04:03,000 至於個案它是否
00:04:03,000 00:04:06,000 你的第14條第3款就寫啦
00:04:06,000 00:04:08,000 法定身分依法院公聽申請補助
00:04:08,000 00:04:11,000 公職人員是關係人依法令規定
00:04:11,000 00:04:13,000 公開公平方式辦理之補助
00:04:13,000 00:04:15,000 這些是要揭露的啊
00:04:16,000 00:04:18,000 你不揭露是要罰的捏
00:04:18,000 00:04:20,000 我不是罰你啦
00:04:22,000 00:04:23,000 是吧
00:04:23,000 00:04:26,000 這個因為這個是個案的問題
00:04:26,000 00:04:27,000 這不是個案
00:04:27,000 00:04:28,000 又來了
00:04:29,000 00:04:31,000 每次法務部你都跟我講個案
00:04:31,000 00:04:34,000 連任署也跟我講個案都叫個案
00:04:36,000 00:04:37,000 因為我們沒有這一家
00:04:37,000 00:04:38,000 我上網去查
00:04:38,000 00:04:39,000 我上網去查
00:04:39,000 00:04:43,000 我們很多委員都很守法
00:04:43,000 00:04:46,000 監察院這裡頭總共7000多個案件我去查的
00:04:46,000 00:04:47,000 對不對
00:04:47,000 00:04:50,000 A立委關係機會承接台電採購法
00:04:51,000 00:04:52,000 依法揭露啊
00:04:53,000 00:04:57,000 某個立委關係人他只是某某學校的董事啊
00:04:57,000 00:05:00,000 那學校取得國科會的補助啊
00:05:00,000 00:05:02,000 按照產創的條例
00:05:02,000 00:05:03,000 對不對
00:05:03,000 00:05:04,000 科學技術基本法
00:05:04,000 00:05:05,000 促餐法等等
00:05:05,000 00:05:06,000 他都有揭露啊
00:05:06,000 00:05:07,000 77萬都有揭露
00:05:07,000 00:05:09,000 260萬都有揭露
00:05:09,000 00:05:11,000 199.9萬不用揭露
00:05:13,000 00:05:14,000 這叫個案
00:05:15,000 00:05:17,000 現在是跟你討論機制耶
00:05:17,000 00:05:19,000 法就定在這裡
00:05:20,000 00:05:21,000 我沒有他們
00:05:21,000 00:05:23,000 我沒有他們實際上這一個
00:05:23,000 00:05:26,000 所以是三八署沒有把資料給你
00:05:26,000 00:05:27,000 對我們沒有這個資料
00:05:27,000 00:05:29,000 他的全管單位我們並不是全管單位
00:05:29,000 00:05:31,000 我沒有辦法去認定說
00:05:31,000 00:05:33,000 到底他是什麼樣的一個法律行為
00:05:33,000 00:05:35,000 來三八署經濟部有沒有
00:05:37,000 00:05:39,000 跟委員報告這個個案
00:05:39,000 00:05:42,000 因為是涉及到立法委員的話
00:05:42,000 00:05:44,000 就是在監察院
00:05:44,000 00:05:46,000 個案會在監察院處理
00:05:48,000 00:05:50,000 我只是叫你公開而已耶
00:05:50,000 00:05:52,000 你的立充法這邊是公開
00:05:52,000 00:05:54,000 你去把法條看清楚
00:05:57,000 00:05:58,000 你們都給我
00:05:58,000 00:06:01,000 你再這樣子我經委會找我再排一次
00:06:04,000 00:06:07,000 然後再請我們這個翁仁再聯席好了
00:06:09,000 00:06:11,000 報告委員謝謝委員的關心
00:06:11,000 00:06:12,000 第一個呢
00:06:12,000 00:06:14,000 我現在不是跟你討論個案
00:06:14,000 00:06:15,000 我現在就是機制
00:06:15,000 00:06:17,000 所以我上次你們也答應我
00:06:17,000 00:06:18,000 會跟聯政署
00:06:18,000 00:06:19,000 聯政署我派代表來喔
00:06:19,000 00:06:21,000 不是署長來
00:06:21,000 00:06:22,000 我派代表來
00:06:22,000 00:06:24,000 他說你們兩個會回去研究
00:06:24,000 00:06:25,000 上次是這個
00:06:25,000 00:06:27,000 我不曉得是哪一個次長
00:06:27,000 00:06:29,000 應該是何次還是賴次這樣子
00:06:29,000 00:06:32,000 跟委員報告我們確實會後有做
00:06:32,000 00:06:35,000 您關心我們有做檢討
00:06:35,000 00:06:36,000 第一個呢
00:06:36,000 00:06:37,000 因為呢
00:06:37,000 00:06:41,000 這個我們現在就是按照委員的要求
00:06:41,000 00:06:45,000 我們要清查過去五年所有的補助案件
00:06:45,000 00:06:48,000 這個第一個現在已經開始啟動
00:06:48,000 00:06:49,000 另外還有呢
00:06:49,000 00:06:52,000 其實我們部裡面各個機關
00:06:52,000 00:06:55,000 都有這些揭露的這個網頁
00:06:55,000 00:06:56,000 但是
00:06:56,000 00:06:57,000 但是呢
00:06:57,000 00:06:59,000 沒有你揭露網頁沒關係
00:06:59,000 00:07:00,000 揭露網頁可以慢慢做
00:07:00,000 00:07:02,000 但是起碼可以上到監察院
00:07:02,000 00:07:04,000 剛剛我列的這個平台
00:07:04,000 00:07:06,000 因為上次是
00:07:07,000 00:07:10,000 剛剛您關心的案件呢
00:07:10,000 00:07:15,000 其實監察院已經有主動來請經濟部提供相關的資訊
00:07:15,000 00:07:18,000 我們也依照監察院的來函提供了相關的資訊
00:07:18,000 00:07:22,000 現在已經都給監察院在進行相關的調查
00:07:22,000 00:07:25,000 對因為他如果沒有揭露的話
00:07:25,000 00:07:28,000 在這個第19條
00:07:28,000 00:07:31,000 律從法的第18條是罰你們機關
00:07:31,000 00:07:33,000 罰商務署
00:07:33,000 00:07:36,000 然後第19條是罰個人
00:07:36,000 00:07:37,000 比如說他還是拒不提供嘛
00:07:37,000 00:07:38,000 對不對
00:07:38,000 00:07:39,000 申請人這個不提供
00:07:39,000 00:07:41,000 我有什麼很生氣的地方是說
00:07:41,000 00:07:43,000 上次我已經講過了
00:07:43,000 00:07:46,000 我們審查委員審東西啊
00:07:46,000 00:07:48,000 我要先填什麼
00:07:48,000 00:07:51,000 有沒有利益迴避嘛
00:07:51,000 00:07:53,000 我要填我要揭露嘛
00:07:53,000 00:07:56,000 我們審查委員都要填都要揭露
00:07:56,000 00:07:59,000 申請人他更應該要揭露
00:07:59,000 00:08:01,000 申請人揭露了之後
00:08:01,000 00:08:04,000 我作為一個審查委員明白有這層關係
00:08:04,000 00:08:06,000 只是明白
00:08:06,000 00:08:09,000 但不影響我審查他這個案子是不是
00:08:09,000 00:08:12,000 符合這個補助的要旨
00:08:12,000 00:08:15,000 如果他公司的產品服務能力很好
00:08:15,000 00:08:17,000 該補就要補啊
00:08:17,000 00:08:19,000 我不會因為他是總統的女兒
00:08:19,000 00:08:21,000 什麼什麼行政院長的兒子
00:08:21,000 00:08:22,000 這跟那個也沒關係
00:08:22,000 00:08:24,000 是跟他的技術能力有關係
00:08:24,000 00:08:26,000 這一點是要肯定啊
00:08:26,000 00:08:29,000 因為審查委員是從專業去弄
00:08:29,000 00:08:32,000 那可是如果審查人不知道
00:08:32,000 00:08:34,000 我覺得這個就不對嘛
00:08:34,000 00:08:36,000 所以立法法這邊的話
00:08:36,000 00:08:37,000 他規定的是這樣
00:08:37,000 00:08:39,000 你事後也可以公開啊
00:08:39,000 00:08:41,000 補也可以啊
00:08:41,000 00:08:44,000 所以我要追的是這件事情啊
00:08:44,000 00:08:46,000 再麻煩連任署
00:08:46,000 00:08:47,000 連任署
00:08:47,000 00:08:49,000 我再問一個
00:08:49,000 00:08:51,000 請經濟部請回
00:08:51,000 00:08:54,000 然後呢我想要問一下連任署
00:08:54,000 00:08:57,000 上次呢我是沒有在公開講
00:08:57,000 00:09:00,000 我們就拿這一個來看
00:09:02,000 00:09:04,000 我請問一下
00:09:04,000 00:09:08,000 什麼叫做具有對價之交易行為
00:09:08,000 00:09:09,000 你的認知
00:09:09,000 00:09:12,000 那個經濟部請回沒關係
00:09:12,000 00:09:14,000 我關於具有
00:09:14,000 00:09:17,000 這個關於這一條的一個法律的規定
00:09:17,000 00:09:19,000 它是有補助買賣租賃承攬
00:09:19,000 00:09:23,000 或其他具有對價關係的交易行為
00:09:23,000 00:09:26,000 那所謂具有對價關係的交易行為
00:09:26,000 00:09:27,000 它有兩個部份
00:09:27,000 00:09:29,000 一個具有對價關係
00:09:29,000 00:09:30,000 一個是交易行為
00:09:30,000 00:09:31,000 那我簡單問好了
00:09:31,000 00:09:34,000 我用一個個例子啦
00:09:34,000 00:09:37,000 假設你開一家公司嘛
00:09:37,000 00:09:39,000 我投資500萬嘛
00:09:39,000 00:09:41,000 我換得你的股票嘛
00:09:41,000 00:09:43,000 這算不算對價交易
00:09:43,000 00:09:44,000 那不一定
00:09:44,000 00:09:46,000 那我跟有人解釋一下
00:09:46,000 00:09:47,000 那個對價通常
00:09:47,000 00:09:49,000 那你先告訴我試的是什麼
00:09:49,000 00:09:51,000 我現在跟您解釋
00:09:51,000 00:09:52,000 對價的關係
00:09:52,000 00:09:54,000 像買賣租賃承攬
00:09:54,000 00:09:57,000 它會有一個大概一個市場的價格
00:09:57,000 00:09:58,000 所以我們去交易的話
00:09:58,000 00:10:00,000 它會有所謂的對價
00:10:00,000 00:10:01,000 但是投資的項目
00:10:01,000 00:10:02,000 它可能就很廣
00:10:02,000 00:10:05,000 它有它也許有具有它的一個政策目的
00:10:05,000 00:10:06,000 做的投資
00:10:06,000 00:10:09,000 我們跟你講政策目的你在對號入座
00:10:09,000 00:10:10,000 我現在就講的是一般
00:10:10,000 00:10:11,000 我就投資你的公司
00:10:11,000 00:10:12,000 我付你500萬
00:10:12,000 00:10:14,000 然後取得你的股票20張
00:10:14,000 00:10:15,000 我們兩個合意的嘛
00:10:15,000 00:10:18,000 這算不算對價之交易行為啦
00:10:18,000 00:10:20,000 那我想這個對這個投資
00:10:20,000 00:10:22,000 你只要回答是或不是啦
00:10:22,000 00:10:25,000 投資它的一個定義法律
00:10:25,000 00:10:27,000 並沒有一個明確的規定
00:10:27,000 00:10:31,000 你看那個在民法買賣租賃承攬
00:10:31,000 00:10:34,000 它都有一個民法都有規定
00:10:34,000 00:10:35,000 但是投資並沒有
00:10:35,000 00:10:37,000 部長這樣解釋可以嗎
00:10:37,000 00:10:38,000 我不曉得部長
00:10:38,000 00:10:41,000 我現在付500萬買股票
00:10:41,000 00:10:44,000 換得你20張算不算對價交易
00:10:44,000 00:10:46,000 我想這個事實
00:10:46,000 00:10:48,000 這個是委員所關心的是
00:10:48,000 00:10:51,000 一個事實的一個認定
00:10:51,000 00:10:53,000 那這部分還在研議
00:10:53,000 00:10:56,000 那我們回到14條來一個看
00:10:56,000 00:10:58,000 他說其他具有對價之交易行為
00:10:58,000 00:11:01,000 前面有講利是就是買賣租賃承攬
00:11:01,000 00:11:02,000 這個在民法規定
00:11:02,000 00:11:03,000 這是一個雙無其一
00:11:03,000 00:11:04,000 我們要管前面
00:11:04,000 00:11:05,000 前面有多清楚
00:11:05,000 00:11:06,000 就是一個利是
00:11:06,000 00:11:08,000 從這個民法這個裡面
00:11:08,000 00:11:09,000 從那個買賣租賃承攬
00:11:09,000 00:11:12,000 就可以看出是不是一個對價的交易行為
00:11:12,000 00:11:15,000 這不但是要雙方的一個對價
00:11:15,000 00:11:16,000 而且他必須有一個
00:11:16,000 00:11:18,000 所以我們現在可以跟
00:11:18,000 00:11:19,000 念法律的人說
00:11:19,000 00:11:20,000 我花500萬
00:11:20,000 00:11:22,000 然後換得公司股票20張
00:11:22,000 00:11:25,000 這個利是這個不準確啦
00:11:25,000 00:11:28,000 這個還是需要做一個個案上的認定
00:11:28,000 00:11:30,000 我現在要問說
00:11:30,000 00:11:32,000 這個是認定的權利
00:11:32,000 00:11:34,000 是在屬於監察院
00:11:34,000 00:11:36,000 我們沒辦法幫監察院回答這個問題
00:11:36,000 00:11:38,000 這個確定我們
00:11:38,000 00:11:40,000 這是行政的認定權
00:11:40,000 00:11:42,000 他的認定權以及要不要裁判
00:11:42,000 00:11:43,000 你知道我在問哪一個案子喔
00:11:43,000 00:11:44,000 我知道啊
00:11:44,000 00:11:45,000 但是你舉例說明啊
00:11:45,000 00:11:47,000 我都還沒說你就知道
00:11:47,000 00:11:48,000 我在問哪一個案子
00:11:48,000 00:11:49,000 我剛才在那邊聽
00:11:49,000 00:11:50,000 我就可以看出來
00:11:50,000 00:11:51,000 哪一個
00:11:51,000 00:11:54,000 剛才就是一個投資的行為嘛
00:11:54,000 00:11:57,000 哪一個案子是有投資行為
00:11:57,000 00:11:58,000 我剛才在問雙方行為
00:11:58,000 00:11:59,000 我想這部分委員關心的
00:11:59,000 00:12:01,000 應該今天剛才各位委員
00:12:01,000 00:12:02,000 已經都問得蠻多了嘛
00:12:02,000 00:12:03,000 所以這個一個
00:12:03,000 00:12:06,000 我們回歸到那個第14條的這些的
00:12:06,000 00:12:07,000 我也不要耽誤時間啦
00:12:07,000 00:12:09,000 我想說你們今天的回答一樣
00:12:09,000 00:12:11,000 不然我們下次就請司法修法好了
00:12:11,000 00:12:13,000 我們也看看這個
00:12:13,000 00:12:18,000 投資的話不算對價交易行為
00:12:18,000 00:12:19,000 這個一個交易行為
00:12:19,000 00:12:21,000 這個一定要合乎到
00:12:21,000 00:12:22,000 這都會公報喔
00:12:22,000 00:12:24,000 對價的一個交易的行為
00:12:24,000 00:12:26,000 那這部分要合乎這個定義
00:12:26,000 00:12:28,000 那我們只能就法條上
00:12:28,000 00:12:30,000 就做一個解釋嘛
00:12:30,000 00:12:31,000 來一個觀察
00:12:31,000 00:12:34,000 所以以後我們如果要規避這種
00:12:34,000 00:12:35,000 利害關係法
00:12:35,000 00:12:36,000 規避這種
00:12:36,000 00:12:37,000 這個法律規定的很準喔
00:12:37,000 00:12:39,000 我只要買賣股票
00:12:39,000 00:12:41,000 然後交易這樣就不算了嘛
00:12:41,000 00:12:42,000 這個是
00:12:42,000 00:12:44,000 這個就是一個很明確的
00:12:44,000 00:12:45,000 一個法律的一個規定
00:12:45,000 00:12:46,000 我當然知道啊
00:12:46,000 00:12:47,000 這很明確的規定
00:12:47,000 00:12:48,000 所以他這個買
00:12:48,000 00:12:50,000 所以我現在在問你說對價交易行為
00:12:50,000 00:12:51,000 你的認定是說
00:12:51,000 00:12:52,000 我投資股
00:12:52,000 00:12:53,000 投資你全
00:12:53,000 00:12:54,000 我沒辦法
00:12:54,000 00:12:55,000 我沒辦法在這個裡面的
00:12:55,000 00:12:58,000 假設問題去做一個認定
00:12:58,000 00:12:59,000 我想這就經過
00:12:59,000 00:13:00,000 當然要經過這個認定
00:13:00,000 00:13:02,000 當然要經過討論跟研議
00:13:02,000 00:13:04,000 是不是從個案上是不是有
00:13:04,000 00:13:06,000 有成立這樣的法條的
00:13:06,000 00:13:08,000 這樣的一個規定
00:13:08,000 00:13:10,000 那所以說在這我沒辦法就是說
00:13:10,000 00:13:12,000 舉一個例就認為這就是一個交易
00:13:12,000 00:13:13,000 只有有對價的交易
00:13:13,000 00:13:14,000 或者沒有對價交易
00:13:14,000 00:13:16,000 這我沒辦法做這樣的一個回答
00:13:17,000 00:13:19,000 所以你的答案就是不知道
00:13:19,000 00:13:20,000 不是說不知道
00:13:20,000 00:13:23,000 這個要再做一個研議嘛
00:13:23,000 00:13:24,000 這個還在
00:13:24,000 00:13:25,000 因為個案我們並不清楚
00:13:25,000 00:13:26,000 這個個案到底是怎樣
00:13:26,000 00:13:27,000 好啦我今天終於上了一個
00:13:27,000 00:13:29,000 非常珍貴的法學課
00:13:29,000 00:13:30,000 好不好
00:13:30,000 00:13:33,000 投資500萬換得股票20張
00:13:33,000 00:13:35,000 不算交易對價
00:13:35,000 00:13:37,000 這個我沒辦法去回答這個問題
00:13:37,000 00:13:39,000 我沒有就是說是或不是
00:13:39,000 00:13:40,000 我沒辦法去回答
00:13:40,000 00:13:42,000 好謝謝洪委員