iVOD / 166698

Field Value
IVOD_ID 166698
IVOD_URL https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/166698
日期 2025-12-26
會議資料.會議代碼 院會-11-4-15
會議資料.會議代碼:str 第11屆第4會期第15次會議
會議資料.屆 11
會議資料.會期 4
會議資料.會次 15
會議資料.種類 院會
會議資料.標題 第11屆第4會期第15次會議
影片種類 Clip
開始時間 2025-12-26T12:23:27+08:00
結束時間 2025-12-26T12:26:39+08:00
影片長度 00:03:12
支援功能[0] ai-transcript
video_url https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/c8ec410dc86e14afaf2bb19ce4d72f1f011dc5e1560d0623c03e8cc1f58c59a74159dd19c61a0ed75ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8
委員名稱 沈伯洋
委員發言時間 12:23:27 - 12:26:39
會議時間 2025-12-26T09:00:00+08:00
會議名稱 第11屆第4會期第15次會議(事由:一、討論事項:本院國民黨黨團,建請院會作成決議,針對憲法法庭大法官謝銘洋、呂太郎、陳忠五、尤伯祥、蔡彩貞,因逾越司法權限,予以嚴厲譴責。又此次憲法法庭未依法合法組成,114年憲判字第1號判決有重大明顯瑕疵,應屬當然無效;至於大法官援引此判決,以人數未達憲法訴訟法所定法定門檻10位所作之任何憲法裁判,亦均屬無效,請公決案等6案。二、12月26日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、12月30日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。)
transcript.pyannote[0].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[0].start 8.97471875
transcript.pyannote[0].end 10.15596875
transcript.pyannote[1].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[1].start 10.57784375
transcript.pyannote[1].end 14.12159375
transcript.pyannote[2].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[2].start 14.34096875
transcript.pyannote[2].end 18.42471875
transcript.pyannote[3].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[3].start 18.77909375
transcript.pyannote[3].end 20.66909375
transcript.pyannote[4].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[4].start 20.87159375
transcript.pyannote[4].end 23.08221875
transcript.pyannote[5].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[5].start 23.52096875
transcript.pyannote[5].end 24.12846875
transcript.pyannote[6].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[6].start 24.49971875
transcript.pyannote[6].end 28.49909375
transcript.pyannote[7].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[7].start 28.97159375
transcript.pyannote[7].end 30.35534375
transcript.pyannote[8].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[8].start 30.96284375
transcript.pyannote[8].end 34.10159375
transcript.pyannote[9].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[9].start 34.54034375
transcript.pyannote[9].end 36.49784375
transcript.pyannote[10].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[10].start 36.83534375
transcript.pyannote[10].end 38.69159375
transcript.pyannote[11].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[11].start 39.18096875
transcript.pyannote[11].end 45.64409375
transcript.pyannote[12].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[12].start 46.35284375
transcript.pyannote[12].end 48.14159375
transcript.pyannote[13].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[13].start 48.36096875
transcript.pyannote[13].end 50.26784375
transcript.pyannote[14].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[14].start 50.85846875
transcript.pyannote[14].end 52.98471875
transcript.pyannote[15].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[15].start 53.77784375
transcript.pyannote[15].end 54.41909375
transcript.pyannote[16].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[16].start 55.21221875
transcript.pyannote[16].end 56.79846875
transcript.pyannote[17].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[17].start 56.98409375
transcript.pyannote[17].end 59.90346875
transcript.pyannote[18].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[18].start 60.42659375
transcript.pyannote[18].end 62.99159375
transcript.pyannote[19].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[19].start 63.66659375
transcript.pyannote[19].end 66.31596875
transcript.pyannote[20].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[20].start 66.97409375
transcript.pyannote[20].end 71.69909375
transcript.pyannote[21].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[21].start 71.86784375
transcript.pyannote[21].end 72.54284375
transcript.pyannote[22].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[22].start 72.76221875
transcript.pyannote[22].end 74.56784375
transcript.pyannote[23].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[23].start 74.80409375
transcript.pyannote[23].end 75.47909375
transcript.pyannote[24].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[24].start 75.83346875
transcript.pyannote[24].end 79.93409375
transcript.pyannote[25].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[25].start 80.57534375
transcript.pyannote[25].end 85.82346875
transcript.pyannote[26].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[26].start 87.02159375
transcript.pyannote[26].end 88.48971875
transcript.pyannote[27].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[27].start 88.70909375
transcript.pyannote[27].end 89.26596875
transcript.pyannote[28].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[28].start 90.07596875
transcript.pyannote[28].end 93.01221875
transcript.pyannote[29].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[29].start 93.56909375
transcript.pyannote[29].end 99.05346875
transcript.pyannote[30].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[30].start 99.30659375
transcript.pyannote[30].end 106.76534375
transcript.pyannote[31].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[31].start 107.64284375
transcript.pyannote[31].end 109.68471875
transcript.pyannote[32].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[32].start 109.90409375
transcript.pyannote[32].end 113.11034375
transcript.pyannote[33].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[33].start 113.36346875
transcript.pyannote[33].end 114.91596875
transcript.pyannote[34].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[34].start 115.84409375
transcript.pyannote[34].end 118.05471875
transcript.pyannote[35].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[35].start 119.16846875
transcript.pyannote[35].end 126.08721875
transcript.pyannote[36].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[36].start 127.30221875
transcript.pyannote[36].end 130.42409375
transcript.pyannote[37].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[37].start 130.96409375
transcript.pyannote[37].end 132.22971875
transcript.pyannote[38].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[38].start 132.65159375
transcript.pyannote[38].end 137.54534375
transcript.pyannote[39].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[39].start 138.37221875
transcript.pyannote[39].end 141.98346875
transcript.pyannote[40].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[40].start 142.38846875
transcript.pyannote[40].end 145.03784375
transcript.pyannote[41].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[41].start 145.13909375
transcript.pyannote[41].end 149.84721875
transcript.pyannote[42].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[42].start 150.16784375
transcript.pyannote[42].end 154.36971875
transcript.pyannote[43].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[43].start 154.85909375
transcript.pyannote[43].end 157.33971875
transcript.pyannote[44].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[44].start 157.82909375
transcript.pyannote[44].end 162.67221875
transcript.pyannote[45].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[45].start 163.22909375
transcript.pyannote[45].end 164.91659375
transcript.pyannote[46].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[46].start 165.60846875
transcript.pyannote[46].end 166.78971875
transcript.pyannote[47].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[47].start 167.34659375
transcript.pyannote[47].end 171.34596875
transcript.pyannote[48].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[48].start 172.18971875
transcript.pyannote[48].end 192.86159375
transcript.pyannote[49].speaker SPEAKER_00
transcript.pyannote[49].start 193.67159375
transcript.pyannote[49].end 193.97534375
transcript.whisperx[0].start 9.505
transcript.whisperx[0].end 29.873
transcript.whisperx[0].text 謝謝主席那記得這個去年國會濫權的時候藍白兩黨的修法是想要把自己變成法務部把自己變成調查局結果被憲法法庭宣告違憲為什麼因為他就是要實質架空行政權讓立法權一權獨大這樣的做法是違憲的
transcript.whisperx[1].start 31.233
transcript.whisperx[1].end 52.643
transcript.whisperx[1].text 結果今天立法院竟然做出更扯的決議他已經不是要把自己當作法務部是要把自己當作大法官直接架空憲法法庭立法院竟然可以決定憲法法庭的判決是無效的剛剛瑞雄委員講得很清楚這是實質的迴憲亂政我在這邊跟大家講兩個小故事
transcript.whisperx[2].start 53.837
transcript.whisperx[2].end 79.729
transcript.whisperx[2].text 南韓南韓在去年的時候他們大法官因為政治因素人數不足要七個人才能夠開會但他們人不夠結果南韓的憲法法庭做了什麼事情呢他們就把七人開會的這一個條款直接凍結暫停讓憲法法庭可以存續為什麼因為憲法法庭的存續比什麼事情都要來得更重要
transcript.whisperx[3].start 80.632
transcript.whisperx[3].end 106.557
transcript.whisperx[3].text 我想問今天提案的委員要不要去譴責南韓的憲法法庭毀憲亂政呢我再講另外一個故事北韓北韓的憲法167 168條規定在北韓他們的中央法院必須服務應與他們的人民議會也就是說呢他們的法院獨立性不存在他們的違憲審查不存在因為他們的立法院最大
transcript.whisperx[4].start 107.711
transcript.whisperx[4].end 125.73
transcript.whisperx[4].text 我們今天要通過的剛剛講的說憲法法庭的判決無效這是朝北韓看齊耶難道我們要變成北韓法學嗎我們今天做的事情不就是要讓立法權一權獨大想要讓憲法法庭沒有辦法運作嗎
transcript.whisperx[5].start 127.492
transcript.whisperx[5].end 135.306
transcript.whisperx[5].text 請大家不要忘記剛剛一直在講五個人三個人在講數學的問題真正數學有問題的是通過憲法訴訟法的國民黨跟民眾黨
transcript.whisperx[6].start 138.41
transcript.whisperx[6].end 166.475
transcript.whisperx[6].text 那三個不同意見的大法官其實講得非常的清楚他們也認為憲法法庭的程序很重要所以他們認為應該要能夠類推適用迴避的規定只要類推適用迴避的規定照樣八個人是有辦法來開會的但是為什麼類推適用迴避還是不行呢因為藍白在修法的時候講了要超過七人以上迴避的時候就沒有辦法用那我們剛好就七個
transcript.whisperx[7].start 167.403
transcript.whisperx[7].end 191.93
transcript.whisperx[7].text 那請問超過七人以上到底是七個人還是八個人啊這不是國小數學嗎當時這個文字就已經提醒會造成困境結果竟然用這個完全不符合數學原理的超過七人以上實時癱瘓了憲法法庭然後用十人的門檻在只有八個人開會的時候說要十個人才可以開會從頭到尾癱瘓憲法法庭的都是國民黨跟民眾黨謝謝