| IVOD_ID |
161477 |
| IVOD_URL |
https://ivod.ly.gov.tw/Play/Clip/1M/161477 |
| 日期 |
2025-05-16 |
| 會議資料.會議代碼 |
院會-11-3-12 |
| 會議資料.會議代碼:str |
第11屆第3會期第12次會議 |
| 會議資料.屆 |
11 |
| 會議資料.會期 |
3 |
| 會議資料.會次 |
12 |
| 會議資料.種類 |
院會 |
| 會議資料.標題 |
第11屆第3會期第12次會議 |
| 影片種類 |
Clip |
| 開始時間 |
2025-05-16T11:59:12+08:00 |
| 結束時間 |
2025-05-16T12:02:20+08:00 |
| 影片長度 |
00:03:08 |
| 支援功能[0] |
ai-transcript |
| video_url |
https://ivod-lyvod.cdn.hinet.net/vod_1/_definst_/mp4:1MClips/fe07dedb5caff7461f702d850d75a6b7b8e2d73ce5d96c5b62e7e08914747559504fb69bf61eef5a5ea18f28b6918d91.mp4/playlist.m3u8 |
| 委員名稱 |
吳思瑤 |
| 委員發言時間 |
11:59:12 - 12:02:20 |
| 會議時間 |
2025-05-16T09:00:00+08:00 |
| 會議名稱 |
第11屆第3會期第12次會議（事由：一、討論事項：本院委員許宇甄、羅智強、葛如鈞等52人擬具公投提案主文為：「賴清德總統定位對岸為境外敵對勢力，人民擔心兩岸進入準戰爭狀態。你是否同意政府應避免戰爭，不讓台灣變成實施軍事戒嚴、青年喪命且家園被毀的烏克蘭？」請公決案等16案。二、5月16日上午9時至10時為國是論壇時間。三、5月20日下午5時至6時為處理臨時提案時間。） |
| transcript.pyannote[0].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[0].start |
3.52409375 |
| transcript.pyannote[0].end |
6.00471875 |
| transcript.pyannote[1].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[1].start |
6.03846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[1].end |
12.24846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[2].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[2].start |
12.60284375 |
| transcript.pyannote[2].end |
13.41284375 |
| transcript.pyannote[3].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[3].start |
13.68284375 |
| transcript.pyannote[3].end |
27.14909375 |
| transcript.pyannote[4].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[4].start |
27.80721875 |
| transcript.pyannote[4].end |
28.78596875 |
| transcript.pyannote[5].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[5].start |
29.12346875 |
| transcript.pyannote[5].end |
46.52159375 |
| transcript.pyannote[6].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[6].start |
47.28096875 |
| transcript.pyannote[6].end |
48.15846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[7].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[7].start |
48.68159375 |
| transcript.pyannote[7].end |
60.86534375 |
| transcript.pyannote[8].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[8].start |
61.97909375 |
| transcript.pyannote[8].end |
64.37534375 |
| transcript.pyannote[9].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[9].start |
64.99971875 |
| transcript.pyannote[9].end |
72.66096875 |
| transcript.pyannote[10].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[10].start |
73.15034375 |
| transcript.pyannote[10].end |
78.11159375 |
| transcript.pyannote[11].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[11].start |
78.60096875 |
| transcript.pyannote[11].end |
81.43596875 |
| transcript.pyannote[12].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[12].start |
81.79034375 |
| transcript.pyannote[12].end |
86.97096875 |
| transcript.pyannote[13].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[13].start |
87.13971875 |
| transcript.pyannote[13].end |
99.40784375 |
| transcript.pyannote[14].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[14].start |
99.84659375 |
| transcript.pyannote[14].end |
104.16659375 |
| transcript.pyannote[15].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[15].start |
104.47034375 |
| transcript.pyannote[15].end |
115.96221875 |
| transcript.pyannote[16].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[16].start |
116.50221875 |
| transcript.pyannote[16].end |
118.13909375 |
| transcript.pyannote[17].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[17].start |
118.52721875 |
| transcript.pyannote[17].end |
120.97409375 |
| transcript.pyannote[18].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[18].start |
122.00346875 |
| transcript.pyannote[18].end |
126.23909375 |
| transcript.pyannote[19].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[19].start |
126.54284375 |
| transcript.pyannote[19].end |
131.09909375 |
| transcript.pyannote[20].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[20].start |
131.72346875 |
| transcript.pyannote[20].end |
138.87846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[21].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[21].start |
139.70534375 |
| transcript.pyannote[21].end |
145.51034375 |
| transcript.pyannote[22].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[22].start |
145.98284375 |
| transcript.pyannote[22].end |
161.74409375 |
| transcript.pyannote[23].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[23].start |
162.58784375 |
| transcript.pyannote[23].end |
165.52409375 |
| transcript.pyannote[24].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[24].start |
165.87846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[24].end |
168.37596875 |
| transcript.pyannote[25].speaker |
SPEAKER_00 |
| transcript.pyannote[25].start |
168.57846875 |
| transcript.pyannote[25].end |
188.59221875 |
| transcript.whisperx[0].start |
3.787 |
| transcript.whisperx[0].end |
26.879 |
| transcript.whisperx[0].text |
主席各位同仁大家辛苦了我想來舉幾個例子大家來看看這樣的題目能不能夠作為公投的題目第一題請問你是否同意台灣各政黨的負責人不應當率眾違法包圍司法機關不應當發動民粹來鬥臭司法公然妨礙司法公正 |
| transcript.whisperx[1].start |
27.879 |
| transcript.whisperx[1].end |
44.073 |
| transcript.whisperx[1].text |
再來一題,請問你是否同意各個政黨應當具備正確的人權意識以及正確的史觀,不應當誤用濫用納粹等獨裁威權的符號,消費他國的歷史事件,嚴重損及台灣國際形象? |
| transcript.whisperx[2].start |
47.338 |
| transcript.whisperx[2].end |
60.566 |
| transcript.whisperx[2].text |
最後一題請問你是否同意國會議長應當謹言慎行不宜發表歧視性的言論物化女性傷害國會形象 |
| transcript.whisperx[3].start |
62.028 |
| transcript.whisperx[3].end |
76.694 |
| transcript.whisperx[3].text |
我舉了三個簡單的題目這樣的建議案如果納為公投的題目即使它再有社會正當性依舊不能夠成為公投議案的標的為什麼 |
| transcript.whisperx[4].start |
78.675 |
| transcript.whisperx[4].end |
97.903 |
| transcript.whisperx[4].text |
很清楚的公投法的規定任何的提案需要來具備法的明確性更重要的是公投法所規範立委所發動的公投最基本的法定要件就是要符合政策的創制或覆決 |
| transcript.whisperx[5].start |
99.924 |
| transcript.whisperx[5].end |
120.771 |
| transcript.whisperx[5].text |
我剛剛舉的三個例子 社會都很有共感但是因為它並不符合公投法的重大政策的創自及覆決所以立委不能拿來成為公投的題目所以同理可證 台灣沒有廢死 |
| transcript.whisperx[6].start |
122.042 |
| transcript.whisperx[6].end |
138.484 |
| transcript.whisperx[6].text |
大法官的宣告死刑是合憲的在野黨的委員到底是法盲還是文盲我更要說舉辦一次公投要花費的經費至少是9億起跳 |
| transcript.whisperx[7].start |
139.758 |
| transcript.whisperx[7].end |
161.426 |
| transcript.whisperx[7].text |
每增加一個議題就要再新增1.5億的公帑如果議題是合理正當而且合法當花則花但拿不存在的議題來做政治操作這就是浪費公帑耗費社會的資源 |
| transcript.whisperx[8].start |
162.806 |
| transcript.whisperx[8].end |
186.661 |
| transcript.whisperx[8].text |
國民黨民眾黨提的兩個公投文不對題語焉不詳公投綁罷免就是因為他們怕罷免我要再一次說不要拿珍貴的憲法賦權來當政黨的遮羞布不要拿神聖的公民投票來當國民黨怕罷免的救生圈民進黨反對這樣的公投 |