iVOD / 170890

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

林俊憲 @

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:02,000 選問
00:00:15,000 00:00:17,000 好 感謝主席
00:00:17,000 00:00:20,000 本次邀請 北提名人 曾永新議事
00:00:20,000 00:00:22,000 陳北提名人 北選
00:00:27,000 00:00:28,000 藍議書你好
00:00:28,000 00:00:29,000 你好
00:00:29,000 00:00:31,000 真辛苦
00:00:32,000 00:00:34,000 也配合你的勇氣
00:00:34,000 00:00:39,000 你來接受被黃提名做監察院的議長
00:00:39,000 00:00:41,000 不過我幾個問題也是要來跟你請教
00:00:41,000 00:00:42,000 有什麼
00:00:42,000 00:00:45,000 在紙壓棟 國民棟 民眾棟
00:00:45,000 00:00:48,000 都在說 費毒監察院
00:00:48,000 00:00:52,000 其實 要費毒監察院
00:00:52,000 00:00:54,000 只要大家有共識 我們就要來上
00:00:54,000 00:00:56,000 聽到的紙壓棟都不會
00:00:56,000 00:00:59,000 其實民進黨早就拿出來要費監察院
00:00:59,000 00:01:01,000 就是我們民進黨
00:01:01,000 00:01:04,000 但只有民進黨有實際的作為
00:01:04,000 00:01:08,000 民進黨要拿出正式的修憲案
00:01:08,000 00:01:10,000 來費毒監察院
00:01:10,000 00:01:12,000 國民棟阿虎
00:01:12,000 00:01:15,000 我看了整整幾天 國民棟的董事長
00:01:15,000 00:01:16,000 鄭麗雯
00:01:16,000 00:01:18,000 她說費監察院
00:01:18,000 00:01:21,000 不是她優先的課題
00:01:21,000 00:01:25,000 因為連講完就說要費監察院
00:01:25,000 00:01:28,000 結果 國民黨的黨主席
00:01:28,000 00:01:31,000 他說費監察院修憲門檻太高
00:01:31,000 00:01:34,000 不是國民黨優先議題
00:01:34,000 00:01:36,000 國民黨的主席說的
00:01:36,000 00:01:38,000 所以我覺得
00:01:38,000 00:01:41,000 要費監察院
00:01:41,000 00:01:44,000 我認為這是一個假議題
00:01:44,000 00:01:46,000 對蔡英棟來說
00:01:46,000 00:01:48,000 不可以啦 說不可以做
00:01:48,000 00:01:50,000 這五權憲法
00:01:50,000 00:01:53,000 是國民黨的新主牌
00:01:53,000 00:01:57,000 宋文社的五權憲法
00:01:57,000 00:01:59,000 現在給他費毒
00:01:59,000 00:02:01,000 他就不是五權憲法
00:02:01,000 00:02:03,000 你如果要費監察院
00:02:03,000 00:02:05,000 科技他也要費掉
00:02:05,000 00:02:08,000 才能回歸到三權分立
00:02:08,000 00:02:11,000 這就 共同就不可能做這個事
00:02:11,000 00:02:14,000 但是今天為什麼要拿出費監察院
00:02:14,000 00:02:18,000 主要就是要反對監委的臨算
00:02:18,000 00:02:19,000 找個理由
00:02:19,000 00:02:22,000 還要費監察院
00:02:22,000 00:02:25,000 所以我認為這一次的提名
00:02:25,000 00:02:27,000 我比較悲觀
00:02:27,000 00:02:32,000 我不知道你屬性有了解林馬道
00:02:32,000 00:02:36,000 要過的機會很少
00:02:36,000 00:02:38,000 其實這二十幾個監委
00:02:38,000 00:02:39,000 監部一個好的
00:02:39,000 00:02:42,000 我看這二十幾位配提名人
00:02:42,000 00:02:44,000 很多人的學經歷
00:02:44,000 00:02:48,000 比現在的立委多好
00:02:48,000 00:02:50,000 比很多立委還要好
00:02:50,000 00:02:52,000 但是要通過的機會
00:02:52,000 00:02:54,000 我是比較悲觀
00:02:54,000 00:02:55,000 因為在那裡
00:02:55,000 00:02:57,000 黨進黨出
00:02:57,000 00:02:59,000 一致性投票
00:02:59,000 00:03:01,000 全部都好
00:03:01,000 00:03:03,000 所以要給他們費毒
00:03:03,000 00:03:05,000 找不到理由
00:03:05,000 00:03:06,000 所以費監察院
00:03:06,000 00:03:10,000 是要反對監委被提名人
00:03:10,000 00:03:12,000 要全部封殺的一個理由
00:03:12,000 00:03:15,000 這是我個人比較擔心
00:03:15,000 00:03:18,000 我跟官員看法
00:03:18,000 00:03:20,000 這就是政治投票
00:03:20,000 00:03:21,000 我不知道
00:03:21,000 00:03:23,000 你都在等醫師
00:03:23,000 00:03:25,000 看的是怎樣
00:03:25,000 00:03:29,000 我們以前就一直主張制憲
00:03:29,000 00:03:32,000 希望台灣是三權分立
00:03:32,000 00:03:35,000 的一個進步的民主國家
00:03:35,000 00:03:37,000 所以費足監察院
00:03:37,000 00:03:38,000 我並不反對
00:03:38,000 00:03:41,000 但是就像林委員剛剛講的
00:03:41,000 00:03:43,000 如果沒有具體的
00:03:43,000 00:03:45,000 修憲方案的內容
00:03:45,000 00:03:46,000 只是一句話
00:03:46,000 00:03:47,000 說費監察院
00:03:47,000 00:03:49,000 這是不負責任的做法
00:03:49,000 00:03:51,000 但是你講的重點
00:03:51,000 00:03:54,000 現在還沒修憲以前
00:03:54,000 00:03:57,000 現在還要一個憲政機關
00:03:57,000 00:03:58,000 那不對了
00:03:58,000 00:04:00,000 如果說他把它凍結了
00:04:00,000 00:04:01,000 甚至讓他癱瘓
00:04:01,000 00:04:02,000 把他癱瘓了
00:04:02,000 00:04:03,000 這個不對
00:04:03,000 00:04:05,000 因為我剛剛也舉例了
00:04:05,000 00:04:07,000 我說你說台灣治安不好
00:04:07,000 00:04:10,000 難道要廢警政署嗎
00:04:10,000 00:04:13,000 我們用部立醫院服務不好
00:04:13,000 00:04:14,000 那把醫院關掉
00:04:14,000 00:04:15,000 不是這樣子
00:04:15,000 00:04:16,000 如果這樣子
00:04:16,000 00:04:19,000 台灣民眾覺得立法院表現不好
00:04:19,000 00:04:21,000 難道要廢立法院嗎
00:04:21,000 00:04:23,000 所以不是這樣子做
00:04:23,000 00:04:24,000 第一個
00:04:24,000 00:04:25,000 要把它好好做
00:04:25,000 00:04:26,000 改革它
00:04:26,000 00:04:27,000 對啦
00:04:27,000 00:04:28,000 這我同意你的講法
00:04:28,000 00:04:30,000 但是這個來說
00:04:30,000 00:04:32,000 你把監察院癱瘓
00:04:32,000 00:04:33,000 當作政治道歉
00:04:33,000 00:04:36,000 誰受傷最重
00:04:36,000 00:04:37,000 我們的民眾
00:04:37,000 00:04:40,000 我調監察院
00:04:40,000 00:04:43,000 大概一年辦理人民懲情案
00:04:43,000 00:04:46,000 我看最近這五年
00:04:46,000 00:04:49,000 總共有75,000多件
00:04:49,000 00:04:51,000 每年都15,000件
00:04:51,000 00:04:52,000 每一年都15,000多件
00:04:52,000 00:04:53,000 我寫在那裡
00:04:53,000 00:04:54,000 一年比較多
00:04:54,000 00:04:57,000 2024年有16,000多件
00:04:57,000 00:04:59,000 其中96%
00:04:59,000 00:05:01,000 都是人民懲情案
00:05:01,000 00:05:03,000 政府機關主動意商
00:05:03,000 00:05:05,000 只佔4%
00:05:05,000 00:05:07,000 所以你把它廢除
00:05:07,000 00:05:09,000 那等於人民最後
00:05:09,000 00:05:11,000 在司法管道以外
00:05:11,000 00:05:13,000 它最後可以訴求
00:05:13,000 00:05:15,000 就監察院這邊
00:05:15,000 00:05:16,000 對一些機關
00:05:16,000 00:05:18,000 人民如果認為
00:05:18,000 00:05:20,000 它違法行政
00:05:20,000 00:05:22,000 不監察院之後
00:05:22,000 00:05:24,000 你看受害最大了
00:05:24,000 00:05:25,000 其實是民眾
00:05:25,000 00:05:26,000 沒有錯啦
00:05:26,000 00:05:27,000 我就說它
00:05:27,000 00:05:29,000 就失去了深淵的地方
00:05:29,000 00:05:30,000 也很好笑
00:05:30,000 00:05:31,000 在紮壓棟要免
00:05:31,000 00:05:33,000 監察院沒有作為
00:05:33,000 00:05:34,000 說免監察院不好
00:05:34,000 00:05:36,000 說監察院沒公平
00:05:36,000 00:05:37,000 但是
00:05:37,000 00:05:38,000 這兩百兩黨
00:05:38,000 00:05:39,000 時不時
00:05:39,000 00:05:40,000 不惜地拿監察院的報告
00:05:40,000 00:05:42,000 你敢不敢拿它的報告拿出來說
00:05:42,000 00:05:43,000 我拿給你看
00:05:43,000 00:05:46,000 它們的新的稻妻的辦公廳不好
00:05:46,000 00:05:49,000 它說有無大缺失
00:05:49,000 00:05:50,000 國民黨引用
00:05:50,000 00:05:52,000 民眾黨的引用就是
00:05:52,000 00:05:54,000 監察院的調查報告
00:05:54,000 00:05:58,000 你說外交部有洩密案
00:05:58,000 00:06:00,000 那再一個黨引用的
00:06:00,000 00:06:02,000 也是我們監察院的報告
00:06:02,000 00:06:05,000 表示監察院你的調查報告
00:06:05,000 00:06:06,000 其實有很多啦
00:06:06,000 00:06:08,000 連紮壓棟也在用
00:06:08,000 00:06:10,000 你現在說免它不好
00:06:10,000 00:06:12,000 要整個把它貪污掉
00:06:12,000 00:06:15,000 我覺得這是很矛盾的
00:06:15,000 00:06:17,000 而且像我們剛才所說
00:06:17,000 00:06:19,000 海產的人民
00:06:19,000 00:06:22,000 以後他如果覺得太危險
00:06:22,000 00:06:24,000 他不檢察他
00:06:24,000 00:06:27,000 很多人會看見他會受害
00:06:27,000 00:06:28,000 我猜猜
00:06:28,000 00:06:30,000 這台北市政府跟台北市政府有關
00:06:30,000 00:06:31,000 台北市政府
00:06:31,000 00:06:32,000 有個民眾
00:06:32,000 00:06:34,000 他認為
00:06:34,000 00:06:35,000 台北市政府
00:06:35,000 00:06:37,000 有一個工地
00:06:37,000 00:06:39,000 工地你是西港
00:06:39,000 00:06:43,000 他認為占用到人行道的空間
00:06:43,000 00:06:48,000 他說你這個做法是違法
00:06:48,000 00:06:50,000 台北市政府不理他
00:06:50,000 00:06:52,000 民眾陳情案
00:06:52,000 00:06:53,000 台北市政府不理他
00:06:53,000 00:06:54,000 給他補位
00:06:54,000 00:06:57,000 這個民眾他導師
00:06:57,000 00:06:59,000 讓我們簡單一點
00:06:59,000 00:07:01,000 檢察院調查以後
00:07:01,000 00:07:03,000 新聞給台北市政府
00:07:03,000 00:07:05,000 他糾正
00:07:05,000 00:07:07,000 台北市政府你這樣
00:07:07,000 00:07:10,000 違反了台北市政府的自治條例
00:07:10,000 00:07:12,000 你占用到人行的空間
00:07:12,000 00:07:14,000 所以台北市政府
00:07:14,000 00:07:16,000 收到監察院的糾正後
00:07:16,000 00:07:18,000 他改善
00:07:18,000 00:07:19,000 那個民眾
00:07:19,000 00:07:20,000 他自己PO在網路上
00:07:20,000 00:07:24,000 他把所有的程序公文都PO出來
00:07:24,000 00:07:26,000 他監察院監察院幫他導師
00:07:26,000 00:07:28,000 所以
00:07:28,000 00:07:30,000 就像
00:07:30,000 00:07:32,000 剛才我們被提名人收工
00:07:32,000 00:07:34,000 如果大家對監察院有不滿
00:07:34,000 00:07:36,000 那我們應該是要求
00:07:36,000 00:07:38,000 包括你未來要做院長
00:07:38,000 00:07:40,000 他給我們這個監委被提名人
00:07:40,000 00:07:42,000 我們要來改善
00:07:42,000 00:07:44,000 要改革監察院
00:07:44,000 00:07:46,000 監察院可以進步
00:07:46,000 00:07:47,000 其實監察院的形象是
00:07:47,000 00:07:49,000 從那邊開始不好
00:07:49,000 00:07:51,000 你知道嗎 羅副 民意調查
00:07:51,000 00:07:52,000 我不知道
00:07:52,000 00:07:54,000 台南市府你知道嗎
00:07:54,000 00:07:56,000 一般民眾認為
00:07:56,000 00:07:58,000 這是網路調查
00:07:58,000 00:07:59,000 那你
00:07:59,000 00:08:01,000 支不支持廢除監察院
00:08:01,000 00:08:03,000 高達快要七成
00:08:03,000 00:08:05,000 六十八%的人贊成
00:08:05,000 00:08:09,000 就是說一般人對監察院的印象其實不好
00:08:09,000 00:08:12,000 其實這個跟對立法院的滿意度差不多
00:08:12,000 00:08:13,000 差不多
00:08:13,000 00:08:15,000 將近七成不滿意
00:08:15,000 00:08:17,000 如果是你講的
00:08:17,000 00:08:18,000 如果說壞的要給他費度
00:08:18,000 00:08:20,000 這樣立法院也要先費度
00:08:21,000 00:08:23,000 所以應該是
00:08:23,000 00:08:25,000 我們要來要求你們
00:08:25,000 00:08:27,000 你們這次未來可能做院長
00:08:27,000 00:08:29,000 副院長做監委的人
00:08:29,000 00:08:31,000 你要怎麼來
00:08:31,000 00:08:34,000 第一 改善民眾對監察院的印象
00:08:34,000 00:08:36,000 你就有很古典的做法
00:08:36,000 00:08:38,000 你說要讓各位可以變成提交會
00:08:38,000 00:08:41,000 讓民眾了解說明監察院做什麼
00:08:41,000 00:08:46,000 還是說要怎麼來改善監察院的
00:08:46,000 00:08:49,000 讓民眾過去民眾的一些民怨
00:08:49,000 00:08:51,000 對我們部辦的所在
00:08:51,000 00:08:55,000 這個背景有什麼樣的補充嗎
00:08:56,000 00:08:59,000 我一直覺得那個調查官
00:08:59,000 00:09:02,000 或者調查人員的那個素質
00:09:02,000 00:09:04,000 跟人力要提升
00:09:04,000 00:09:07,000 因為監察委員只有二十幾個
00:09:07,000 00:09:10,000 又有七個在國家人權委員會
00:09:10,000 00:09:12,000 所以實際能辦案的人
00:09:12,000 00:09:16,000 他需要這些調查官跟調查人員的協助
00:09:16,000 00:09:18,000 所以如果他們的素質高
00:09:18,000 00:09:19,000 能力夠
00:09:19,000 00:09:22,000 可以再多辦很多的案子
00:09:22,000 00:09:24,000 這個是一個重點
00:09:24,000 00:09:27,000 第二個我想就是民間的團體
00:09:27,000 00:09:30,000 或者民間的力量要引入
00:09:30,000 00:09:34,000 那監察院也可以跟行政單位的某一些
00:09:34,000 00:09:37,000 像剛剛講政風機構連證署合作
00:09:37,000 00:09:40,000 也可以跟立法院在質詢的時候
00:09:40,000 00:09:43,000 所提出來的一些弊案去做主動的調查
00:09:43,000 00:09:45,000 這個都是可以努力的
00:09:45,000 00:09:49,000 其實你看你一年都萬五六十年
00:09:49,000 00:09:53,000 依照監察院目前監委和調查官
00:09:53,000 00:09:54,000 做事了
00:09:54,000 00:09:55,000 編制
00:09:55,000 00:09:57,000 這實在是負擔非常重
00:09:57,000 00:09:59,000 所以調查的品質
00:09:59,000 00:10:00,000 你說的多少好
00:10:00,000 00:10:03,000 這基本上就是一個限制
00:10:03,000 00:10:05,000 這就應該讓我們看法來改善
00:10:05,000 00:10:06,000 警察
00:10:06,000 00:10:09,000 不過圍攻盪的重點
00:10:09,000 00:10:12,000 在沒有修憲完成以前
00:10:12,000 00:10:15,000 監察院就是一個合法的憲政機關
00:10:15,000 00:10:17,000 它有非常必要性的功能
00:10:17,000 00:10:20,000 你不能亂花費去貪污
00:10:20,000 00:10:24,000 這第一個重大損害到人民的權利
00:10:24,000 00:10:28,000 所以我希望對於我們的被提名人
00:10:28,000 00:10:32,000 有很大的敬意和期許
00:10:35,000 00:10:37,000 好 謝謝林委員
00:10:37,000 00:10:38,000 現在我們請