iVOD / 170686

本逐字稿內容由 AI 自動生成,可能包含錯誤、遺漏或誤譯之處。請使用者務必與原始影片音訊內容交叉比對,以確保資訊正確性。另可參考立法院日後釋出的正式公報以取得最終權威版本。

劉建國 @

Start Time End Time Text
00:00:00,000 00:00:07,000 謝謝 有請部長
00:00:07,000 00:00:08,000 有請石崇良部長
00:00:08,000 00:00:14,000 部長如果剛剛照委員委員
00:00:14,000 00:00:17,000 我們依照食安法的第41條
00:00:17,000 00:00:20,000 那77月1號FDA
00:00:20,000 00:00:22,000 做這樣的宣布就不對了
00:00:22,000 00:00:25,000 月保代儲
00:00:25,000 00:00:28,000 跟委員說明喔
00:00:28,000 00:00:31,000 因為在食安法第4條第5項
00:00:31,000 00:00:33,000 也有授權給主管機關
00:00:33,000 00:00:38,000 對於這些停止製造生產
00:00:38,000 00:00:41,000 下架也有對重大的
00:00:41,000 00:00:43,000 那個是只針對重大的
00:00:43,000 00:00:45,000 那麼我們也有這個權利
00:00:45,000 00:00:48,000 重大 食安的問題
00:00:48,000 00:00:50,000 如果一直要持續的用這種
00:00:50,000 00:00:52,000 就有觀念說它叫做重大
00:00:52,000 00:00:54,000 所以中央就必須處理
00:00:54,000 00:00:56,000 那這樣的思維
00:00:56,000 00:00:59,000 會在這次修法的過程裡面
00:00:59,000 00:01:01,000 會有很大的問題存在喔
00:01:01,000 00:01:02,000 食安的問題就是食安的問題
00:01:02,000 00:01:04,000 沒有在分什麼重大或不重大
00:01:04,000 00:01:06,000 應該有這樣的思維啦
00:01:06,000 00:01:08,000 我從三個面下來跟部長討論
00:01:08,000 00:01:10,000 我們4月6號
00:01:10,000 00:01:14,000 4月到6月的油品共是30批嘛
00:01:14,000 00:01:15,000 對不對 對
00:01:15,000 00:01:16,000 那昨天在部長的宣布下
00:01:16,000 00:01:18,000 確定有19批是安全的
00:01:18,000 00:01:20,000 它可以重新上架沒有錯嘛
00:01:20,000 00:01:23,000 那剩下11批中有3批是還沒有出貨
00:01:23,000 00:01:25,000 然後11扣3就剩8批
00:01:25,000 00:01:26,000 7批有問題
00:01:26,000 00:01:29,000 另外一批是無檢體
00:01:29,000 00:01:31,000 確定不可以再上架的油品嘛
00:01:31,000 00:01:33,000 那也就是8批
00:01:33,000 00:01:36,000 這8批衛部跟FD要怎麼處理
00:01:36,000 00:01:39,000 這個通通都是下架回收
00:01:39,000 00:01:41,000 回收 回收完之後咧
00:01:41,000 00:01:43,000 以上有來講
00:01:43,000 00:01:46,000 它有時候可以去做生殖柴油
00:01:46,000 00:01:48,000 去處理掉這樣
00:01:48,000 00:01:49,000 做生殖柴油
00:01:49,000 00:01:51,000 然後全部都做生殖柴油
00:01:51,000 00:01:54,000 還是怎樣處理的一個SOP
00:01:54,000 00:01:56,000 能不能簡單說明清楚一下
00:01:56,000 00:01:58,000 因為量體太大嘛
00:01:58,000 00:01:59,000 總共8批嘛
00:01:59,000 00:02:01,000 那8批到底多少量
00:02:01,000 00:02:03,000 然後你們要怎麼做處理
00:02:03,000 00:02:05,000 怎麼處理
00:02:05,000 00:02:07,000 當然這個你過去的
00:02:07,000 00:02:09,000 這個我們的SOP
00:02:09,000 00:02:12,000 這是由地方來協助處理
00:02:12,000 00:02:15,000 因為這個公司在哪裡
00:02:15,000 00:02:17,000 就是主管機關
00:02:17,000 00:02:19,000 在地的主管機關去處理
00:02:19,000 00:02:21,000 不過我們會來協助
00:02:21,000 00:02:23,000 誰監督不是協助誰監督
00:02:23,000 00:02:25,000 那萬一又出問題咧
00:02:25,000 00:02:27,000 誰要負責
00:02:27,000 00:02:29,000 誰監督啦
00:02:29,000 00:02:31,000 不管你要流向去什麼地方
00:02:31,000 00:02:33,000 甚至達到要銷毀的程度
00:02:33,000 00:02:35,000 那地方政府來處理
00:02:35,000 00:02:37,000 地方衛生局來執行
00:02:37,000 00:02:39,000 那誰來監督
00:02:39,000 00:02:41,000 好 按照我們的這個規定呢
00:02:41,000 00:02:45,000 這個業者就要開始寫這個銷毀計畫
00:02:45,000 00:02:46,000 銷毀計畫
00:02:46,000 00:02:47,000 這個要怎麼處理
00:02:47,000 00:02:49,000 全部是銷毀
00:02:49,000 00:02:51,000 沒有再留用去做生殖品才有
00:02:51,000 00:02:53,000 那也是一種選擇啦
00:02:53,000 00:02:55,000 那麼再來的話呢
00:02:55,000 00:02:57,000 就會由衛生局來審核
00:02:57,000 00:02:59,000 他這個銷毀計畫
00:02:59,000 00:03:01,000 是不是妥適OK
00:03:01,000 00:03:03,000 然後才由衛生局來監督
00:03:03,000 00:03:05,000 業者按照這個計畫來實施
00:03:05,000 00:03:07,000 那這個需要有存證
00:03:07,000 00:03:09,000 就是要攝影存證
00:03:09,000 00:03:11,000 留有出面紀錄
00:03:11,000 00:03:13,000 這樣
00:03:13,000 00:03:15,000 地方衛生局誰來監督
00:03:15,000 00:03:17,000 地方衛生局
00:03:17,000 00:03:19,000 他們執行不用監督
00:03:19,000 00:03:21,000 就是他們去監督業者
00:03:21,000 00:03:23,000 怎麼處理
00:03:23,000 00:03:25,000 就按照第八條的規定來執行
00:03:25,000 00:03:27,000 地方主管機關
00:03:27,000 00:03:29,000 這個我們有訂了一個
00:03:29,000 00:03:31,000 叫食品及其相關產品
00:03:31,000 00:03:33,000 回收銷毀處理
00:03:33,000 00:03:35,000 辦法的第八條來處理
00:03:35,000 00:03:37,000 這個都明訂了
00:03:37,000 00:03:39,000 我知道
00:03:39,000 00:03:41,000 食安法裡面
00:03:41,000 00:03:43,000 原本通通有明訂嘛
00:03:43,000 00:03:45,000 就是沒有人要叫食安法
00:03:45,000 00:03:47,000 這樣的方式去處理
00:03:47,000 00:03:49,000 所以我現在講說這一些
00:03:49,000 00:03:51,000 要銷毀的8P的這些油品
00:03:53,000 00:03:55,000 地方政府來執行
00:03:55,000 00:03:57,000 誰來監督
00:03:57,000 00:03:59,000 就是他由業者執行
00:03:59,000 00:04:01,000 然後由
00:04:01,000 00:04:03,000 地方主管機關監督
00:04:03,000 00:04:05,000 那中央要不要派人督導
00:04:05,000 00:04:07,000 我們可以
00:04:07,000 00:04:09,000 不然再出問題誰來承擔
00:04:09,000 00:04:11,000 我們會派人去
00:04:11,000 00:04:13,000 這個要很明確
00:04:13,000 00:04:15,000 好不好
00:04:15,000 00:04:17,000 過去已經執行過很多次了
00:04:17,000 00:04:19,000 OK
00:04:19,000 00:04:21,000 我這次要提醒部長跟署長一件事情
00:04:21,000 00:04:23,000 就這件
00:04:23,000 00:04:25,000 這個事件的中聯油品
00:04:25,000 00:04:27,000 他其實現在包括我們都知道了
00:04:27,000 00:04:29,000 台山胡壽還有胡茂
00:04:29,000 00:04:31,000 他市佔率應該是3到4成左右
00:04:31,000 00:04:33,000 30%
00:04:33,000 00:04:35,000 所以他目前18公升的
00:04:35,000 00:04:37,000 實用油的供應市場
00:04:37,000 00:04:39,000 其實已經出現那個叫
00:04:39,000 00:04:41,000 這個你們應該知道
00:04:41,000 00:04:43,000 然後即便
00:04:43,000 00:04:45,000 下來有相當
00:04:45,000 00:04:47,000 這些中油的油品重新上架
00:04:47,000 00:04:49,000 我想那個整個市場的接受度
00:04:49,000 00:04:51,000 他可能還有一段距離
00:04:51,000 00:04:53,000 然後
00:04:53,000 00:04:55,000 要不要在這時間點
00:04:55,000 00:04:57,000 要防止一些其他的品牌
00:04:57,000 00:04:59,000 在油品監督上可能要再加嚴
00:04:59,000 00:05:01,000 這個
00:05:01,000 00:05:03,000 至關重要
00:05:03,000 00:05:05,000 也不僅要確保這個油品的品質
00:05:05,000 00:05:07,000 也要嚴防這不效業者
00:05:07,000 00:05:09,000 趁這次風波上下起手
00:05:09,000 00:05:11,000 這個可能要請部長
00:05:11,000 00:05:13,000 要會同這個
00:05:13,000 00:05:15,000 消保處經濟部
00:05:15,000 00:05:17,000 等相關單位
00:05:17,000 00:05:19,000 來加嚴密的管控跟監督
00:05:19,000 00:05:21,000 跟委員報告
00:05:21,000 00:05:23,000 其實在院裡面
00:05:23,000 00:05:25,000 也有這個定期的
00:05:25,000 00:05:27,000 在開這個聯繫會議
00:05:27,000 00:05:29,000 就是涉及到
00:05:29,000 00:05:31,000 市場端的穩定
00:05:31,000 00:05:33,000 因為確實像委員講的
00:05:33,000 00:05:35,000 他這個他提供的油品
00:05:35,000 00:05:37,000 其實是快到40%
00:05:37,000 00:05:39,000 所以其他當然現在以其他
00:05:39,000 00:05:41,000 三個主要的煉油廠
00:05:41,000 00:05:43,000 來做供應
00:05:43,000 00:05:45,000 到目前的推估上
00:05:45,000 00:05:47,000 供應量是還夠
00:05:47,000 00:05:49,000 但是我們會繼續往前去
00:05:49,000 00:05:51,000 推估
00:05:51,000 00:05:53,000 那麼有必要的時候也會讓他去進口
00:05:53,000 00:05:55,000 一些出油進來再精煉
00:05:55,000 00:05:57,000 這樣速度會更快
00:05:57,000 00:05:59,000 我再請教部長從另外面向來討論
00:05:59,000 00:06:01,000 我們現在食安法的宣法
00:06:01,000 00:06:03,000 是會比照這個疫情指揮中心的方式
00:06:03,000 00:06:05,000 來朝鄉成立食安指揮中心
00:06:05,000 00:06:07,000 對不對
00:06:07,000 00:06:09,000 然後
00:06:09,000 00:06:11,000 我支持啦
00:06:11,000 00:06:13,000 但是我要去你的建議我剛剛特別提到
00:06:13,000 00:06:15,000 如果要比照這個疫情指揮中心
00:06:15,000 00:06:17,000 但這個成立的時機
00:06:17,000 00:06:19,000 絕對不是只有什麼
00:06:19,000 00:06:21,000 重大
00:06:21,000 00:06:23,000 只能做到什麼重大的食安事件
00:06:23,000 00:06:25,000 才去成立
00:06:25,000 00:06:27,000 應該不是這樣對不對
00:06:27,000 00:06:29,000 那依據這個傳染病
00:06:29,000 00:06:31,000 防治法17條規定
00:06:31,000 00:06:33,000 專案組成員機關
00:06:33,000 00:06:35,000 考量國內外的疫情
00:06:35,000 00:06:37,000 嚴重程度統籌
00:06:37,000 00:06:39,000 各種資源設備大大大
00:06:39,000 00:06:41,000 等必要時
00:06:41,000 00:06:43,000 報請行政院同意成立中央流行疫情指揮中心
00:06:43,000 00:06:45,000 也就是說
00:06:45,000 00:06:47,000 受審組成員機關可以考量
00:06:47,000 00:06:49,000 可以去判斷疫情的
00:06:49,000 00:06:51,000 實際狀況
00:06:51,000 00:06:53,000 但是食安跟疫情不一樣
00:06:53,000 00:06:55,000 但是
00:06:55,000 00:06:57,000 我們也是會參考國內外
00:06:57,000 00:06:59,000 的這些資訊
00:06:59,000 00:07:01,000 因為有時候
00:07:01,000 00:07:03,000 國際貿易的關係也有可能輸入
00:07:03,000 00:07:05,000 所以我們也會去參考
00:07:05,000 00:07:07,000 國內外的情形
00:07:07,000 00:07:09,000 然後跟這個
00:07:09,000 00:07:11,000 流行疫情指揮中心
00:07:11,000 00:07:13,000 有類似的概念
00:07:13,000 00:07:15,000 我只是要提醒部長跟署長
00:07:15,000 00:07:17,000 我覺得這個食安跟疫情還是不同
00:07:17,000 00:07:19,000 所以食安不能
00:07:19,000 00:07:21,000 只有受審組成員機關去做考量
00:07:21,000 00:07:23,000 判斷
00:07:23,000 00:07:25,000 他只要有食安的餘力
00:07:25,000 00:07:27,000 我剛剛特別提到不論大小
00:07:27,000 00:07:29,000 食安重大事件
00:07:29,000 00:07:31,000 不論大小我們都應該啟動
00:07:31,000 00:07:33,000 這個指揮中心進行相關
00:07:33,000 00:07:35,000 情況的一個研判
00:07:35,000 00:07:37,000 也是
00:07:37,000 00:07:39,000 跟委員說明
00:07:39,000 00:07:41,000 最主要的目的就是
00:07:41,000 00:07:43,000 他需要去整合資源
00:07:43,000 00:07:45,000 還有調度
00:07:45,000 00:07:47,000 相關的設備人力的時候
00:07:47,000 00:07:49,000 那麼
00:07:49,000 00:07:51,000 意思就是說他的規模
00:07:51,000 00:07:53,000 或者是涉及到要
00:07:53,000 00:07:55,000 跨縣市跨局處
00:07:55,000 00:07:57,000 這個時候
00:07:57,000 00:07:59,000 我們就會有這個指揮中心的設立
00:07:59,000 00:08:01,000 那有一些
00:08:01,000 00:08:03,000 他的規模是比較小
00:08:03,000 00:08:05,000 或單一
00:08:05,000 00:08:07,000 一個單獨事件
00:08:07,000 00:08:09,000 沒有擴大的情形
00:08:09,000 00:08:11,000 我們都會有風險的評估分級
00:08:11,000 00:08:13,000 來決定
00:08:13,000 00:08:15,000 那你要不要參照內政部所謂的中央
00:08:15,000 00:08:17,000 在應變中心的作用
00:08:17,000 00:08:19,000 所謂的一級開設二級開設三級開設
00:08:19,000 00:08:21,000
00:08:21,000 00:08:23,000 我們有個授權
00:08:23,000 00:08:25,000 一級開設
00:08:25,000 00:08:27,000 來提升指揮的量能
00:08:27,000 00:08:29,000 跟指揮官的
00:08:29,000 00:08:31,000 這樣的一個階級
00:08:31,000 00:08:33,000 應該是這樣
00:08:33,000 00:08:35,000 因為我是看這一次
00:08:35,000 00:08:37,000 我們食藥署第一時間是把
00:08:37,000 00:08:39,000 106年食品安全之一會定定的
00:08:39,000 00:08:41,000 食品違規案件
00:08:41,000 00:08:43,000 產品下架
00:08:43,000 00:08:45,000 回收封存銷毀階層之處理原則
00:08:45,000 00:08:47,000 來處理這次的
00:08:47,000 00:08:49,000 這個問題的有的
00:08:49,000 00:08:51,000 下架的一個程序
00:08:51,000 00:08:53,000 但是這106年的食品安全之一會
00:08:53,000 00:08:55,000 他認為
00:08:55,000 00:08:57,000 我們明比的有
00:08:57,000 00:08:59,000 只要下架第一層就可以
00:08:59,000 00:09:01,000 顯然大眾就覺得不可以
00:09:01,000 00:09:03,000 部長也覺得這個
00:09:03,000 00:09:05,000 做法是有問題
00:09:05,000 00:09:07,000 應該是這樣
00:09:07,000 00:09:09,000 所以才會繞著一大圈花了快一周
00:09:09,000 00:09:11,000 然後一層二層變到三層
00:09:11,000 00:09:13,000 所以我想這個
00:09:13,000 00:09:15,000 實際上就是如此
00:09:15,000 00:09:17,000 沒有什麼容許空間
00:09:17,000 00:09:19,000 有疑慮我們中央就應該當機立斷了
00:09:19,000 00:09:21,000 所以我是要求
00:09:21,000 00:09:23,000 就是說針對106當時
00:09:23,000 00:09:25,000 訂定的這個產品下架
00:09:25,000 00:09:27,000 回收封存銷毀階層之處理原則
00:09:27,000 00:09:29,000 也必須要全面修正
00:09:29,000 00:09:31,000 加嚴
00:09:31,000 00:09:33,000 同時對未來三四屆的大小
00:09:33,000 00:09:35,000 就是必須啟動食安的
00:09:35,000 00:09:37,000 指揮中心
00:09:37,000 00:09:39,000 跟委員說明當時
00:09:39,000 00:09:41,000 下架的這個原則
00:09:41,000 00:09:43,000 階層原則是把
00:09:43,000 00:09:45,000 違反
00:09:45,000 00:09:47,000 衛生安全標準的通通在
00:09:47,000 00:09:49,000 同一類就是第八類
00:09:49,000 00:09:51,000 但是這個違反衛生安全標準
00:09:51,000 00:09:53,000 的這個品項
00:09:53,000 00:09:55,000 其實還蠻多種的
00:09:55,000 00:09:57,000 所以可能還是需要
00:09:57,000 00:09:59,000 把它按照這個風險
00:09:59,000 00:10:01,000 危害的情形稍微做一點分級
00:10:01,000 00:10:03,000 然後我們會
00:10:03,000 00:10:05,000 重新檢討這一個原則
00:10:05,000 00:10:07,000 也會在這次修法
00:10:07,000 00:10:09,000 把它明確入法
00:10:09,000 00:10:11,000 從這個方向修法我們就來支持
00:10:11,000 00:10:13,000 最後一個面向
00:10:13,000 00:10:15,000 剛剛楊委員我其實聽到最後面講的
00:10:15,000 00:10:17,000 人力問題
00:10:17,000 00:10:19,000 這個人力問題真的非常嚴重
00:10:19,000 00:10:21,000 我不曉得這幾天有沒有討論到這個人力問題
00:10:21,000 00:10:23,000 你看114年FDA機場
00:10:23,000 00:10:25,000 167DN衛生局的機場
00:10:25,000 00:10:27,000 163全國共計
00:10:27,000 00:10:29,000 634年來應付全國
00:10:29,000 00:10:31,000 40萬家的食品業者
00:10:31,000 00:10:33,000 這個比例
00:10:33,000 00:10:35,000 這個比例懸殊
00:10:35,000 00:10:37,000 太大了
00:10:37,000 00:10:39,000 真的太大了那不只如此
00:10:39,000 00:10:41,000 你看
00:10:41,000 00:10:43,000 我們2300萬的這個食品安全
00:10:43,000 00:10:45,000 還有剛剛特別講
00:10:45,000 00:10:47,000 40萬家
00:10:47,000 00:10:49,000 然後630人來做這樣把關
00:10:49,000 00:10:51,000 不然就這樣合理嗎
00:10:51,000 00:10:53,000 量能夠嗎
00:10:53,000 00:10:55,000 其實跟委員說明這個事件
00:10:55,000 00:10:57,000 不只是食藥署
00:10:57,000 00:10:59,000 中央的人力大家很辛苦
00:10:59,000 00:11:01,000 其實地方第一線的
00:11:01,000 00:11:03,000 衛生人員其實他們
00:11:03,000 00:11:05,000 也很辛苦啦所以未來
00:11:05,000 00:11:07,000 我們應該是朝兩個方向來處理
00:11:07,000 00:11:09,000 一個
00:11:09,000 00:11:11,000 利用智慧化的方式
00:11:11,000 00:11:13,000 來管理不要通通都是
00:11:13,000 00:11:15,000 要跳脫傳統的這個
00:11:15,000 00:11:17,000 集查方式盡量要能夠
00:11:17,000 00:11:19,000 這個智慧化的監測
00:11:19,000 00:11:21,000 預警系統我們再來更完備
00:11:21,000 00:11:23,000 第二個分風險
00:11:23,000 00:11:25,000 等級來查這個是很重要
00:11:25,000 00:11:27,000 不然你會花了很多的力氣
00:11:27,000 00:11:29,000 但是沒有切中到
00:11:29,000 00:11:31,000 那個要點所以還會
00:11:31,000 00:11:33,000 未來會我們會按照這個風險
00:11:33,000 00:11:35,000 去處理這個
00:11:35,000 00:11:37,000 集查的項目也避免
00:11:37,000 00:11:39,000 第一線的人力過勞
00:11:39,000 00:11:41,000 當然如果能夠增加人力
00:11:41,000 00:11:43,000 我們當然也是全力來爭取
00:11:43,000 00:11:45,000 所以部長能不能朝向
00:11:45,000 00:11:47,000 跟行政院來爭取人力
00:11:47,000 00:11:49,000 增加與否我們持續
00:11:49,000 00:11:51,000 爭取其實我們過去就去年
00:11:51,000 00:11:53,000 就爭取主要是
00:11:53,000 00:11:55,000 擴充我們的邊境查驗
00:11:55,000 00:11:57,000 因為邊境查驗也很重要
00:11:57,000 00:11:59,000 從源頭就管所以我們去年
00:11:59,000 00:12:01,000 是先增加邊境
00:12:01,000 00:12:03,000 這個查驗的人力那接下來我們
00:12:03,000 00:12:05,000 也會按照我們業務的需要
00:12:05,000 00:12:07,000 來持續的爭取我看
00:12:07,000 00:12:09,000 歷史的數據
00:12:09,000 00:12:11,000 再請教部長
00:12:11,000 00:12:13,000 台北103年通過食品業者
00:12:13,000 00:12:15,000 專門職業或技術
00:12:15,000 00:12:17,000 這個證照人員設施及管理
00:12:17,000 00:12:19,000 辦法104年開始考試
00:12:19,000 00:12:21,000 那至今台灣有數千位
00:12:21,000 00:12:23,000 的食品技師
00:12:23,000 00:12:25,000 然後這群食品技師就是
00:12:25,000 00:12:27,000 食安的第一線也應該是
00:12:27,000 00:12:29,000 衛部FDA的最好助手
00:12:29,000 00:12:31,000 但這幾年衛部
00:12:31,000 00:12:33,000 應該是不重視
00:12:33,000 00:12:35,000 食品技師的情況
00:12:35,000 00:12:37,000 所以他食品技師的報考人數
00:12:37,000 00:12:39,000 是雪崩式的下跌
00:12:39,000 00:12:41,000 104年
00:12:41,000 00:12:43,000 招考的時候報考人數高達
00:12:43,000 00:12:45,000 2000多人
00:12:45,000 00:12:47,000 到去年只剩下568人報考
00:12:47,000 00:12:49,000 那不僅報考人數雪崩式的
00:12:49,000 00:12:51,000 類減已經取得證照的
00:12:51,000 00:12:53,000 最終離開這個職場的
00:12:53,000 00:12:55,000 去職業的
00:12:55,000 00:12:57,000 也不再少數了
00:12:57,000 00:12:59,000 也沒有說台灣的食品安全
00:12:59,000 00:13:01,000 最堅強的後盾的一群人
00:13:01,000 00:13:03,000 怎麼會變這樣
00:13:03,000 00:13:05,000 這一次優品事件
00:13:05,000 00:13:07,000 食品技師公會發出聲明
00:13:07,000 00:13:09,000 他們提出具體建議
00:13:09,000 00:13:11,000 我不想部長有掌握嗎
00:13:11,000 00:13:13,000 我們都有在注意
00:13:13,000 00:13:15,000 但是也謝謝委員提醒
00:13:15,000 00:13:17,000 這是我們當然在
00:13:17,000 00:13:19,000 傳統的公務人力上
00:13:19,000 00:13:21,000 會很吃緊
00:13:21,000 00:13:23,000 但是這些專業人員包含
00:13:23,000 00:13:25,000 食品技師或者是公衛師
00:13:25,000 00:13:27,000 這些那麼也都是
00:13:27,000 00:13:29,000 經過一定的教育
00:13:29,000 00:13:31,000 跟這個考核
00:13:31,000 00:13:33,000 那麼才有辦法取得這些資格的
00:13:33,000 00:13:35,000 我們來研議看看
00:13:35,000 00:13:37,000 讓他能夠導入來擴充
00:13:37,000 00:13:39,000 我們這些所需要的
00:13:39,000 00:13:41,000 稽查人力或者食安的人力
00:13:41,000 00:13:43,000 他們公會是這樣建立
00:13:43,000 00:13:45,000 建樹成立食品技術的
00:13:45,000 00:13:47,000 驗證制度
00:13:47,000 00:13:49,000 那內部有食品技師
00:13:49,000 00:13:51,000 也要有權責
00:13:51,000 00:13:53,000 同時也要搭配外部的
00:13:53,000 00:13:55,000 食品技師的驗證
00:13:55,000 00:13:57,000 最後再加上政府任用的
00:13:57,000 00:13:59,000 公職的食品技師
00:13:59,000 00:14:01,000 形成一個三方共同監督的制度
00:14:01,000 00:14:03,000 才能真正的落實
00:14:03,000 00:14:05,000 這個食安網
00:14:05,000 00:14:07,000 所以如果今天我們食安法要修法
00:14:07,000 00:14:09,000 是不是也包含這個
00:14:09,000 00:14:11,000 所謂第三方檢驗
00:14:11,000 00:14:13,000 是不是可以更
00:14:13,000 00:14:15,000 可以來接有
00:14:15,000 00:14:17,000 自詢食品技師
00:14:17,000 00:14:19,000 來做更勤力的合作
00:14:19,000 00:14:21,000 好 跟委員說明
00:14:21,000 00:14:23,000 其實我們現在一定規模
00:14:23,000 00:14:25,000 以上的食品廠其實是
00:14:25,000 00:14:27,000 有要求要有食品技師
00:14:27,000 00:14:29,000 只是還沒有做到
00:14:29,000 00:14:31,000 委員剛剛提的有點像
00:14:31,000 00:14:33,000 獨立簽證的概念
00:14:33,000 00:14:35,000 他要獨立負責簽證
00:14:35,000 00:14:37,000
00:14:37,000 00:14:39,000 這個
00:14:39,000 00:14:41,000 跟他的業主之間的關係
00:14:41,000 00:14:43,000 因為畢竟現在是受聘
00:14:43,000 00:14:45,000 那如何
00:14:45,000 00:14:47,000 讓我們來研究他
00:14:47,000 00:14:49,000 入法要求一定要聘
00:14:49,000 00:14:51,000 但是他是獨立職業住廠
00:14:51,000 00:14:53,000 用這個設計來
00:14:53,000 00:14:55,000 我們來
00:14:55,000 00:14:57,000 這個研究一下看看未來是
00:14:57,000 00:14:59,000 我的想法比較是朝向第三方的
00:14:59,000 00:15:01,000 這個制度
00:15:01,000 00:15:03,000 第三方驗證
00:15:03,000 00:15:05,000 那第三方驗證現在也是
00:15:05,000 00:15:07,000 有這個設計
00:15:07,000 00:15:09,000 只是把第三方驗證單位
00:15:09,000 00:15:11,000 納入
00:15:11,000 00:15:13,000 一定要有
00:15:13,000 00:15:15,000 食品技師去執行
00:15:15,000 00:15:17,000 他的第三方驗證
00:15:17,000 00:15:19,000 因為其實這個他的
00:15:19,000 00:15:21,000 專業在所以現在雖然有第三方
00:15:21,000 00:15:23,000 驗證單位去驗證他
00:15:23,000 00:15:25,000 應該多數也會找食品醫師來做
00:15:25,000 00:15:27,000 只是我們現在沒有強制
00:15:27,000 00:15:29,000 那未來我們來看看
00:15:29,000 00:15:31,000 在那個第三方驗證
00:15:31,000 00:15:33,000 因為我們現在修法是第三方驗證
00:15:33,000 00:15:35,000 的單位也要經過主管機關
00:15:35,000 00:15:37,000 的認證才能去
00:15:37,000 00:15:39,000 做驗證
00:15:39,000 00:15:41,000 然後我們在那個認證的
00:15:41,000 00:15:43,000 辦法上面去把食品技師
00:15:43,000 00:15:45,000 或者是公公公衛師
00:15:45,000 00:15:47,000 受一定的這個
00:15:47,000 00:15:49,000 食品相關訓練
00:15:49,000 00:15:51,000 讓他強制的進入這個
00:15:51,000 00:15:53,000 辦法認證裡面
00:15:53,000 00:15:55,000 因為我
00:15:55,000 00:15:57,000 我是覺得這第三方的一個檢驗
00:15:57,000 00:15:59,000 的制度基本上如果可以確立
00:15:59,000 00:16:01,000 而且可以去落實
00:16:01,000 00:16:03,000 我覺得對台灣的
00:16:03,000 00:16:05,000 食品安全會大大提升
00:16:05,000 00:16:07,000 因為所謂的
00:16:07,000 00:16:09,000 第三方的這樣的一個
00:16:09,000 00:16:11,000 一個包含
00:16:11,000 00:16:13,000 在日本有很多的
00:16:13,000 00:16:15,000 像社福的機構基本上
00:16:15,000 00:16:17,000 他們是第三方評價
00:16:17,000 00:16:19,000 然後如果在食品安全部可以有
00:16:19,000 00:16:21,000 第三方的這樣一個檢驗的制度
00:16:21,000 00:16:23,000 我覺得對台灣整體而言
00:16:23,000 00:16:25,000 的食品安全
00:16:25,000 00:16:27,000 應該會
00:16:27,000 00:16:29,000 有顯著的更好的這樣的一個
00:16:29,000 00:16:31,000 效益存在
00:16:31,000 00:16:33,000 能不能朝這個方向來思考
00:16:33,000 00:16:35,000 這個委員給我們一個很好的方向
00:16:35,000 00:16:37,000 因為我們現在正在強化第三方
00:16:37,000 00:16:39,000 驗證他的這個
00:16:39,000 00:16:41,000 強度跟授權
00:16:41,000 00:16:43,000 那把這個專業
00:16:43,000 00:16:45,000 人員把他導入
00:16:45,000 00:16:47,000 強制這個要去做這個
00:16:47,000 00:16:49,000 驗證的認證
00:16:49,000 00:16:51,000 第三方認證的單位需要有
00:16:51,000 00:16:53,000 這樣的人力專業人力
00:16:53,000 00:16:55,000 我們可以來把他納入這個辦法裡面
00:16:55,000 00:16:57,000 來處理